Gilmore v. Pogue et al
| Perry Drake Gilmore, Jr |
| Kevin Jones and Bradley Pogue |
| 5:2017cv01880 |
| July 14, 2017 |
| US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| Orangeburg Office |
| Lexington |
| Cameron McGowan Currie |
| Kaymani D West |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Defendant |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
67
ORDER RULING ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: After considering the record, the applicable law, and the 64 Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, the court agrees with the Report's recommendation the matter be remanded to state court. Accordingly, the court adopts the Report by reference in this Order. This matter is hereby remanded to the Lexington County Court of Common Pleas. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by Honorable Cameron McGowan Currie on 12/4/2017. (prou, )
|
|
Filing
55
OPINION AND ORDER RULING ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: The court agrees with the 49 Report's recommendation Plaintiff's Motion for Temporary Restraining Order/Preliminary Injunction/Summary Judgment (ECF No. [15 ]) be denied as moot, as Plaintiff's charges have been resolved or, alternatively, on the merits. Accordingly, the court adopts the Report by reference in this Order. Plaintiff's motion is denied. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by Honorable Cameron McGowan Currie on 10/16/2017. (prou, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
