Hammoud v. Mosley
Petitioner: Wissam T Hammoud
Respondent: Bonita Mosley
Case Number: 5:2017cv02419
Filed: September 7, 2017
Court: US District Court for the District of South Carolina
Office: Orangeburg Office
County: Edgefield
Presiding Judge: Richard M Gergel
Presiding Judge: Kaymani D West
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 30, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 47 ORDER RULING ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: The R & R of the Magistrate Judge (Dkt. No. 38 ) is ADOPTED as the order of the Court and Respondent's motion for summary judgment (Dkt. No. 25 ) is GRANTED. A certificate of appealability is DENIED. Signed by Honorable Richard M Gergel on 07/30/2018. (dsto, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Hammoud v. Mosley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Wissam T Hammoud
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Bonita Mosley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?