Bryan v. South Carolina, State of
T Terell Bryan, Terence Terell Bryan, Terrence Terell Bryan and T Terance Bryan |
South Carolina, State of |
5:2019cv00239 |
January 28, 2019 |
US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
Timothy M Cain |
Kaymani D West |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 26, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 14 ***DOCUMENTS MAILED: #11 Order Dismissing Case w/NEF, #13 Judgment w/NEF, placed in U.S. Mail to T. Terell Bryan, #254638, LCI, PO Box 205, Ridgeville, SC, 29472. (prou, ) |
Filing 13 JUDGMENT: This case is dismissed without prejudice and this case is closed. (prou, ) |
Filing 11 ORDER DISMISSING CASE: This case is DISMISSED without prejudice. The Clerk of Court shall close the file. Signed by Honorable Timothy M Cain on 2/26/2019. (prou, ) |
Filing 8 ***DOCUMENT MAILED: #7 Proper Form Order w/NEF and AO240, placed in U.S. Mail to T. Terell Bryan, #254638, LCI, PO Box 205, Ridgeville, SC, 29472 (dsto, ) |
Filing 7 PROPER FORM ORDER: Case to be brought into proper form by 2/19/2019. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kaymani D West on 01/29/2019. (dsto, ) |
Filing 2 TRUE DIVISION FOR TRIAL: Charleston. (prou, ) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by T Terell Bryan. (Attachments: #1 Letter from T. Terell Bryan, #2 Envelope)(prou, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.