Pandya et al v. Cuccinelli
Purvi Pravinkumar Joshi and Hirenkumar Govindlal Pandya |
Kenneth Cuccinelli |
5:2020cv01541 |
April 22, 2020 |
US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
J Michelle Childs |
Other Immigration Actions |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 13, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction and Failure to State a Claim Upon Which Relief May be Granted by Kenneth Cuccinelli. Response to Motion due by 7/6/2020. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit FOIA Email, #2 Exhibit FOIA Email, #3 Exhibit Declaration)No proposed order.(Edgerton, Jacqueline) |
Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed U.S. Attorney's Office for the District of South Carolina by Hirenkumar Govindlal Pandya, Purvi Pravinkumar Joshi. Kenneth Cuccinelli served on 4/27/2020, answer due 6/26/2020. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-Proof of Service)(Banias, Bradley) |
Filing 3 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Purvi Pravinkumar Joshi, Hirenkumar Govindlal Pandya.(asni, ) |
Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Kenneth Cuccinelli. U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. (asni, ) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Kenneth Cuccinelli ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0420-9064350.), filed by Hirenkumar Govindlal Pandya, Purvi Pravinkumar Joshi. Service due by 7/21/2020(asni, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.