Carroway v. Barnes
Petitioner: Vontaise Trezman Carroway
Respondent: Nannette Barnes
Case Number: 5:2020cv03210
Filed: September 8, 2020
Court: US District Court for the District of South Carolina
Presiding Judge: J Michelle Childs
Referring Judge: Kaymani D West
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 16, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 13, 2020 Filing 19 OBJECTION to #16 Report and Recommendation by Vontaise Trezman Carroway. Reply to Objections due by 10/27/2020. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(prou, )
September 29, 2020 Filing 18 ***DOCUMENT MAILED: #15 Order - Habeas-Service-No Answer, placed in U.S. Mail via certified mail (article #7018 1830 0001 8538 6485) from Florence Clerk's Office to Attorney General of the US, Dept. Of Justice, Room B-103, 950 Pennsylvania Avenue, Washington, DC 20530-001. (prou, )
September 29, 2020 Filing 17 ***DOCUMENTS MAILED: #15 Order - Habeas-Service-No Answer w/NEF, #16 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION w/NEF, placed in U.S. Mail from Florence Clerk's Office to Vontaise Trezman Carroway, #24190-171, Federal Correctional Institution Bennettsville, PO Box 52020, Bennettsville, SC 29512. (prou, )
September 29, 2020 Filing 16 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: The undersigned recommends the district judge dismiss the petition in the above-captioned matter without prejudice. Objections to R&R due by 10/13/2020. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kaymani D West on 9/29/2020. (prou, )
September 29, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ORDER authorizing service of process by clerk, directing respondent not to answer and directing the petitioner to notify the clerk in writing of any change of address. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kaymani D West on 9/29/2020. (Attachments: #1 Petition)(prou, )
September 22, 2020 Filing 11 Filing fee received: $ 5.00, receipt number 400014764. (gnan )
September 10, 2020 Filing 10 ***DOCUMENT MAILED w/NEF #8 Proper Form Order and AO 240 placed in U.S. Mail from Florence Clerks Office to Vontaise Trezman Carroway #24190-171 Federal Correctional Institution Bennettsville PO Box 52020 Bennettsville, SC 29512 (hcic, )
September 10, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 8 PROPER FORM ORDER: Case to be brought into proper form by 10/1/2020. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kaymani D West on 9/10/2020. (prou, )
September 8, 2020 Filing 2 TRUE DIVISION FOR TRIAL: Florence. (prou, )
September 8, 2020 Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Vontaise Trezman Carroway. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(prou, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Carroway v. Barnes
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Vontaise Trezman Carroway
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Nannette Barnes
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?