318 Royal Street LLC v. Thomas et al
| 318 Royal Street LLC doing business as Carrington Townhouses |
| Manleto Shamar Thomas and Destiny Natisha Thomas |
| 5:2021cv00032 |
| January 6, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| Shiva V Hodges |
| Mary Geiger Lewis |
| Rent Lease & Ejectment |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 29, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 15 Mail Returned as Undeliverable. Addressee: Manleto Shamar Thomas. Document Returned: #12 Order Ruling on Report and Recommendation, (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (cbru, ) |
| Filing 14 ***DOCUMENT E-MAILED #12 Order Ruling on Report and Recommendation to Orangeburg County Clerk of Court, ***DOCUMENT MAILED #12 Order Ruling on Report and Recommendation, placed in U.S. Mail from Columbia Clerks Office to Destiny Natisha Thomas, 901 Corona Dr., Apt. 7C, Orangeburg, SC 29115; Manleto Shamar Thomas 901 Corona Dr., Apt. 7C, Orangeburg, SC 29115; The Honorable Winnifa Brown-Clark, Clerk of Court, Orangeburg County Court of Common Pleas, PO Box 9000, Orangeburg, SC 29115-9000 (cbru, ahil) |
Filing 12
ORDER adopting #8 Report and Recommendation, remanding this action to the Orangeburg County Magistrate Court. Signed by Honorable Mary Geiger Lewis on 1/27/2021. Clerk's Notice: Attorneys are responsible for supplementing the State Record with all documents filed in Federal Court.(cbru, )
|
| Filing 10 ***DOCUMENTS MAILED #7 Order to Notify of Address Change, #8 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION and 9 Transfer of Case Management placed in U.S. Mail from Columbia Clerks Office to Destiny Natisha Thomas and Manleto Shamar Thomas, 901 Corona Dr., Apt. 7C, Orangeburg, SC 29115. (lbak/kbos) |
| Filing 9 ***CASE MANAGEMENT TRANSFERRED to civil case manager for Judge Mary Geiger Lewis. Any future filings must be sent to the Clerk's Office at the following address: 901 Richland Street, Columbia, South Carolina 29201. (lbak) |
| Filing 8 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION recommending the district judge remand this matter to the Orangeburg County Magistrate Court for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Because this is only a recommendation, the Clerk of Court shall not immediately certify this matter to the Orangeburg County Magistrate Court, but shall forward the case file and any objections to the United States District Judge for final disposition. Objections to R&R due by 1/21/2021. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. Signed by Magistrate Judge Shiva V. Hodges on 1/7/2021. (lbak) |
|
Filing 7
ORDER directing plaintiff to notify Clerk in writing of any address changes. Motion granted: #3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Magistrate Judge Shiva V. Hodges on 1/7/2021. (lbak)
|
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL (), filed by Manleto Shamar Thomas, Destiny Natisha Thomas. (Attachments: #1 Supporting Documents) Filing corrected for event type. (lbak) Modified on 1/7/2021 to change document number.(lbak) |
| Filing 4 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Destiny Natisha Thomas. (lbak) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (Restricted Access) by Destiny Natisha Thomas, Manleto Shamar Thomas. Response to Motion due by 1/20/2021. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. Motions referred to Shiva V. Hodges. (lbak) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
