McCoy v. Harris et al
Plaintiff: Robert Christopher McCoy
Defendant: C. Harris and USP Atlanta (FBOP)
Case Number: 5:2021cv02646
Filed: August 18, 2021
Court: US District Court for the District of South Carolina
Presiding Judge: Bruce Howe Hendricks
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 12, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 12, 2021 Filing 18 Letter from Robert C. McCoy. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(prou, )
September 15, 2021 Filing 15 ***DOCUMENT MAILED: #14 Order Ruling on Report and Recommendation w/NEF, placed in U.S. Mail from Florence Clerk's Office to Robert Christopher McCoy, #32794-171, United States Penitentiary 1 at Coleman, Federal Correctional Complex, PO Box 1033, Coleman, FL 33521. (prou, )
September 15, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ORDER RULING ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: The Court adopts the Magistrate Judge's Report (ECF No. #10 ), and the Court transfers this action to the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia for further handling. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by Honorable Bruce Howe Hendricks on 9/15/2021. (prou, )
August 26, 2021 Filing 11 ***DOCUMENT MAILED: #10 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION w/NEF, placed in U.S. Mail from Florence Clerk's Office to Robert Christopher McCoy, #32794-171, United States Penitentiary 1 at Coleman, Federal Correctional Complex, PO Box 1033, Coleman, FL 33521. (prou, )
August 26, 2021 Filing 10 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: The undersigned recommends this case be transferred to the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia for further handling. Objections to R&R due by 9/9/2021. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kaymani D West on 8/26/2021. (prou, )
August 18, 2021 Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (Restricted Access) by Robert Christopher McCoy. Response to Motion due by 9/1/2021. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. (Attachments: #1 Financial Certificate, #2 Inmate Inquiries, #3 Envelope)No proposed order.Motions referred to Kaymani D West.(dsto, )
August 18, 2021 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against C. Harris, USP Atlanta (FBOP), filed by Robert Christopher McCoy. Service due by 11/16/2021. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(dsto, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: McCoy v. Harris et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Robert Christopher McCoy
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: C. Harris
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: USP Atlanta (FBOP)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?