Coleman v. James
Petitioner: Christian Coleman
Respondent: Warden Tonya James
Case Number: 5:2022cv01578
Filed: May 18, 2022
Court: US District Court for the District of South Carolina
Presiding Judge: Timothy M Cain
Referring Judge: Kaymani D West
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 20, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 8, 2022 Filing 18 ***DOCUMENT MAILED: 17 Text Order on Motion for Extension of Time, placed in U.S. Mail from Florence Clerk's Office to Christian Coleman, #344192, Kershaw Correctional Institution, Hickory D 148, 4848 Goldmine Hwy, Kershaw, SC 29067. (prou, )
July 8, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 17 TEXT ORDER granting #16 Motion for Extension of Time. The response to the Petition is now due August 8, 2022. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kaymani D West on 7/8/2022.(prou, )
July 8, 2022 Filing 16 First MOTION for Extension of Time by Tonya James. Response to Motion due by 7/22/2022. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service)No proposed order.Motions referred to Kaymani D West.(Maye, William)
May 24, 2022 Filing 14 ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF SERVICE Executed Acknowledgment filed by Tonya James. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service)(Brown, Melody)
May 19, 2022 Filing 13 ***DOCUMENTS MAILED: 12 Order on Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, #11 Order 2254 w/NEF, placed in U.S. Mail from Florence Clerk's Office to Christian Coleman, #344192, Kershaw Correctional Institution, Hickory D 148, 4848 Goldmine Hwy, Kershaw, SC 29067. (prou, )
May 19, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis per #11 Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kaymani D West on 5/19/2022.(prou, )
May 19, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER authorizing service of process. Directing petitioner to notify the clerk in writing of any change of address. Return and Memorandum due by 7/8/2022. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kaymani D West on 5/19/2022. (Attachments: #1 Petition)(prou, )
May 18, 2022 Filing 4 TRUE DIVISION FOR TRIAL: Orangeburg. (prou, )
May 18, 2022 Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (Restricted Access) by Christian Coleman. Response to Motion due by 6/1/2022. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)No proposed order.Motions referred to Kaymani D West.(prou, )
May 18, 2022 Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Christian Coleman. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum to Support Habeas Corpus Application, #2 Envelope)(prou, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Coleman v. James
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Christian Coleman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Warden Tonya James
Represented By: William Joseph Maye
Represented By: Melody Jane Brown
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?