Thomas v. Warden of Ridgeland Correctional Institution
| Gary Wayne Thomas |
| South Carolina, State of and Warden of Ridgeland Correctional Institution |
| 5:2022cv03882 |
| November 4, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| David C Norton |
| Kaymani D West |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 2, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 14 Letter from Gary W. Thomas. (Attachments: #1 SCDC Cooper Trust Fund Withdrawal, #2 Envelope)(prou, ) |
| Filing 12 Filing fee: $ 5.00, receipt number SCX400015900. (prou, ) |
| Filing 10 ***DOCUMENTS MAILED: #8 Proper Form Order w/ NEF and Form AO 240, placed in U.S. Mail from Florence Clerk's Office to Gary Wayne Thomas, #366010, Ridgeland Correctional Institution, SB-40, PO Box 2039, Ridgeland, SC 29936. (prou, ) |
Filing 8
PROPER FORM ORDER: Case to be brought into proper form by 12/9/2022. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kaymani D West on 11/18/2022. (prou, )
|
| Filing 2 TRUE DIVISION FOR TRIAL: Columbia. (prou, ) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Gary Wayne Thomas. (Attachments: #1 Letter from Gary W. Thomas, #2 Supporting Documents, #3 Supporting Documents, #4 Envelopes)(prou, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
