Funchess v. SCANSTAT Technologies, LLC et al
Jacquita Funchess |
SCANSTAT Technologies, LLC, Regional Medical Center of Orangeburg and Calhoun Counties, The d/b/a The Regional Medical Center and Matthew Blackburn, MD |
5:2022cv04711 |
December 29, 2022 |
US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
Bruce Howe Hendricks |
P.I.: Other |
28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 23, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 23 RESPONSE in Opposition re #13 MOTION to Remand Response filed by Regional Medical Center of Orangeburg and Calhoun Counties, The.Reply to Response to Motion due by 3/2/2023 Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6. (Horton, Kevin) |
Filing 22 RESPONSE in Opposition re #13 MOTION to Remand Response filed by SCANSTAT Technologies, LLC.Reply to Response to Motion due by 2/28/2023 Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6. (Rawl, A) |
Filing 21 AFFIDAVIT of Service of Defendant, Matthew Blackburn, MD by Jacquita Funchess. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit)(Abbott, Blake) |
Filing 20 TEXT ORDER granting #19 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response #11 MOTION to Dismiss. Plaintiff's Response to Motion due by 2/27/2023. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. Signed by Honorable Bruce Howe Hendricks on 2/6/2023. (gray) |
Filing 19 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #11 MOTION to Dismiss by Jacquita Funchess. Response to Motion due by 2/21/2023. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit)No proposed order.(Doolittle, Paul) |
Filing 18 TEXT ORDER granting #17 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response. Plaintiff's response to #12 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim due by 02/27/2023. Defendant's response to #13 Motion to Remand due by 02/21/2023. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. Signed by Honorable Bruce Howe Hendricks on 02/06/2023.(gray) Corrected spelling error on 2/6/2023 (gray). |
Filing 17 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #12 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by Jacquita Funchess. Response to Motion due by 2/17/2023. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit)No proposed order.(Doolittle, Paul) |
Filing 16 TEXT ORDER denying #14 Motion to Stay. Signed by Honorable Bruce Howe Hendricks on 2/1/2023. (gray) |
Filing 15 NOTICE of Appearance by Kerry K Jardine on behalf of SCANSTAT Technologies, LLC (Jardine, Kerry) |
Filing 14 MOTION to Stay by Jacquita Funchess. Response to Motion due by 2/10/2023. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. Proposed order is being emailed to chambers with copy to opposing counsel.(Doolittle, Paul) |
Filing 13 MOTION to Remand by Jacquita Funchess. Response to Motion due by 2/9/2023. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. (Attachments: #1 Memo in Support of Remand, #2 Proposed Order)Proposed order is being emailed to chambers with copy to opposing counsel.(Doolittle, Paul) |
Filing 12 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by SCANSTAT Technologies, LLC. Response to Motion due by 2/6/2023. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. (Attachments: #1 Memo in Support, #2 Exhibit 1 - DHEC ANNUAL FEE FOR SEARCH AND DUPLICATION OF MEDICAL RECORD)No proposed order.(Rawl, A) |
Filing 11 MOTION to Dismiss by Regional Medical Center of Orangeburg and Calhoun Counties, The. Response to Motion due by 2/6/2023. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. No proposed order.(Horton, Kevin) |
Filing 9 AFFIDAVIT of Service of defendant, The Regional Medical Center of Orangeburg and Calhoun Counties by Jacquita Funchess. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Proof of Delivery)(Abbott, Blake) |
Filing 8 AFFIDAVIT of Service for ScanSTAT Technologies, LLC by Jacquita Funchess. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Proof of Delivery)(Abbott, Blake) |
Filing 7 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Regional Medical Center of Orangeburg and Calhoun Counties, The.(Horton, Kevin) |
Filing 6 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Jacquita Funchess.(Doolittle, Paul) |
Filing 5 TEXT ORDER granting #4 Motion for Extension of Time. Signed by Honorable Bruce Howe Hendricks on 1/5/2023.(dgar) |
Filing 4 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time by SCANSTAT Technologies, LLC. Response to Motion due by 1/18/2023. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. No proposed order.(Rawl, A) (dgar). |
Filing 2 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by SCANSTAT Technologies, LLC.(dgar) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Orangeburg County Court of Common Pleas, case number 2022-CP-38-01628. (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ASCDC-10868326), filed by SCANSTAT Technologies, LLC. (Attachments: #1 State Court Documents, #2 Declaration in Support of Notice of Removal)(dgar) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.