Funchess v. SCANSTAT Technologies, LLC et al
Plaintiff: Jacquita Funchess
Defendant: SCANSTAT Technologies, LLC, Regional Medical Center of Orangeburg and Calhoun Counties, The d/b/a The Regional Medical Center and Matthew Blackburn, MD
Case Number: 5:2022cv04711
Filed: December 29, 2022
Court: US District Court for the District of South Carolina
Presiding Judge: Bruce Howe Hendricks
Nature of Suit: P.I.: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 23, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 23, 2023 Filing 23 RESPONSE in Opposition re #13 MOTION to Remand Response filed by Regional Medical Center of Orangeburg and Calhoun Counties, The.Reply to Response to Motion due by 3/2/2023 Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6. (Horton, Kevin)
February 21, 2023 Filing 22 RESPONSE in Opposition re #13 MOTION to Remand Response filed by SCANSTAT Technologies, LLC.Reply to Response to Motion due by 2/28/2023 Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6. (Rawl, A)
February 10, 2023 Filing 21 AFFIDAVIT of Service of Defendant, Matthew Blackburn, MD by Jacquita Funchess. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit)(Abbott, Blake)
February 6, 2023 Filing 20 TEXT ORDER granting #19 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response #11 MOTION to Dismiss. Plaintiff's Response to Motion due by 2/27/2023. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. Signed by Honorable Bruce Howe Hendricks on 2/6/2023. (gray)
February 6, 2023 Filing 19 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #11 MOTION to Dismiss by Jacquita Funchess. Response to Motion due by 2/21/2023. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit)No proposed order.(Doolittle, Paul)
February 6, 2023 Filing 18 TEXT ORDER granting #17 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response. Plaintiff's response to #12 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim due by 02/27/2023. Defendant's response to #13 Motion to Remand due by 02/21/2023. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. Signed by Honorable Bruce Howe Hendricks on 02/06/2023.(gray) Corrected spelling error on 2/6/2023 (gray).
February 3, 2023 Filing 17 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #12 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by Jacquita Funchess. Response to Motion due by 2/17/2023. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit)No proposed order.(Doolittle, Paul)
February 1, 2023 Filing 16 TEXT ORDER denying #14 Motion to Stay. Signed by Honorable Bruce Howe Hendricks on 2/1/2023. (gray)
January 30, 2023 Filing 15 NOTICE of Appearance by Kerry K Jardine on behalf of SCANSTAT Technologies, LLC (Jardine, Kerry)
January 27, 2023 Filing 14 MOTION to Stay by Jacquita Funchess. Response to Motion due by 2/10/2023. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. Proposed order is being emailed to chambers with copy to opposing counsel.(Doolittle, Paul)
January 26, 2023 Filing 13 MOTION to Remand by Jacquita Funchess. Response to Motion due by 2/9/2023. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. (Attachments: #1 Memo in Support of Remand, #2 Proposed Order)Proposed order is being emailed to chambers with copy to opposing counsel.(Doolittle, Paul)
January 23, 2023 Filing 12 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by SCANSTAT Technologies, LLC. Response to Motion due by 2/6/2023. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. (Attachments: #1 Memo in Support, #2 Exhibit 1 - DHEC ANNUAL FEE FOR SEARCH AND DUPLICATION OF MEDICAL RECORD)No proposed order.(Rawl, A)
January 23, 2023 Filing 11 MOTION to Dismiss by Regional Medical Center of Orangeburg and Calhoun Counties, The. Response to Motion due by 2/6/2023. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. No proposed order.(Horton, Kevin)
January 17, 2023 Filing 9 AFFIDAVIT of Service of defendant, The Regional Medical Center of Orangeburg and Calhoun Counties by Jacquita Funchess. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Proof of Delivery)(Abbott, Blake)
January 17, 2023 Filing 8 AFFIDAVIT of Service for ScanSTAT Technologies, LLC by Jacquita Funchess. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Proof of Delivery)(Abbott, Blake)
January 13, 2023 Filing 7 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Regional Medical Center of Orangeburg and Calhoun Counties, The.(Horton, Kevin)
January 13, 2023 Filing 6 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Jacquita Funchess.(Doolittle, Paul)
January 5, 2023 Filing 5 TEXT ORDER granting #4 Motion for Extension of Time. Signed by Honorable Bruce Howe Hendricks on 1/5/2023.(dgar)
January 4, 2023 Filing 4 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time by SCANSTAT Technologies, LLC. Response to Motion due by 1/18/2023. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. No proposed order.(Rawl, A) (dgar).
December 29, 2022 Filing 2 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by SCANSTAT Technologies, LLC.(dgar)
December 29, 2022 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Orangeburg County Court of Common Pleas, case number 2022-CP-38-01628. (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ASCDC-10868326), filed by SCANSTAT Technologies, LLC. (Attachments: #1 State Court Documents, #2 Declaration in Support of Notice of Removal)(dgar)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Funchess v. SCANSTAT Technologies, LLC et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jacquita Funchess
Represented By: Paul J Doolittle
Represented By: Blake Garrett Abbott
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: SCANSTAT Technologies, LLC
Represented By: A Victor Rawl, Jr
Represented By: Kerry K Jardine
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Regional Medical Center of Orangeburg and Calhoun Counties, The d/b/a The Regional Medical Center
Represented By: J Bennett Crites, III
Represented By: Kevin Richard Horton
Represented By: Nicholas Clarence Chapma Stewart
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Matthew Blackburn, MD
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?