Ford v. Washam et al
| Katie Ford |
| Roy Washam, Herbert Wayne Matthews and Wayne Matthews Transportation |
| 5:2023cv04719 |
| September 21, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| Mary Geiger Lewis |
| Motor Vehicle |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.) |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 30, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 22
REPLY to Response to Motion re #16 MOTION to Remand to State Court. Response filed by Katie Ford. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Email from Defense Counsel)(Graham, Jonathan) Modified to edit text on 11/7/2023 (cbru, ).
|
|
Filing 21
RESPONSE in Opposition re #16 MOTION to Remand to State Court Response filed by Herbert Wayne Matthews, Roy Washam, Wayne Matthews Transportation.Reply to Response to Motion due by 11/8/2023 Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6. (Walsh, James)
|
|
Filing 20
AMENDED SCHEDULING ORDER: Motions to Amend Pleadings due by 11/21/2023, Plaintiff ID of Expert Witness due by 1/22/2024, Defendant ID of Expert Witnesses Due by 2/21/2024, Records Custodian Affidavit due by 3/22/2024, Discovery due by 4/22/2024, Motion in Limine due by 7/1/2024, Motions due by 5/6/2024, Rule 26(a)(3) Disclosures due by 6/18/2024, Jury Selection Deadline 7/22/2024, Mediation Due by 6/3/2024. Signed by Honorable Mary Geiger Lewis on 10/24/2023. (cbru, )
|
|
Filing 19
Joint Local Rule 26.03 Answers to Interrogatories by Herbert Wayne Matthews, Roy Washam, Wayne Matthews Transportation.(Walsh, James)
|
|
Filing 18
Joint Rule 26(f) Report by Herbert Wayne Matthews, Roy Washam, Wayne Matthews Transportation. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Walsh, James)
|
|
Filing 17
Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Katie Ford.(Graham, Jonathan)
|
|
Filing 16
MOTION to Remand to State Court by Katie Ford. Response to Motion due by 11/1/2023. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. (Attachments: #1 Memo in Support) No proposed order.(Graham, Jonathan) Modified to edit text on 10/19/2023 (cbru, ).
|
|
Filing 14
CLERK'S NOTICE: Plaintiff is reminded that Answers to Local Rule 26.01 Interrogatories are to be filed no later than 14 days after service of the notice of removal. Please file these answers to interrogatories no later than October 25, 2023. (cbru, )
|
|
Filing 13
REPLY by Herbert Wayne Matthews, Roy Washam, Wayne Matthews Transportation to 6 Order,,, Set Deadlines,, . (Walsh, James)
|
|
Filing 12
REPLY by Herbert Wayne Matthews, Roy Washam, Wayne Matthews Transportation to 9 Order. (Walsh, James) Modified to edit entry linkage on 9/29/2023 (cbru, ).
|
|
Filing 11
MEDIATION ORDER. Signed by Honorable Mary Geiger Lewis on 9/22/2023. (cbru, )
|
|
Filing 10
CONFERENCE AND SCHEDULING ORDER: Rule 26 Report due by 10/26/2023, Motions to Amend Pleadings due by 11/21/2023, Plaintiff ID of Expert Witness due by 12/21/2023, Defendant ID of Expert Witnesses Due by 1/22/2024, Records Custodian Affidavit due by 1/22/2024, Discovery due by 3/20/2024, Motion in Limine due by 7/1/2024, Motions due by 4/4/2024, Rule 26(a)(3) Disclosures due by 6/18/2024, Jury Selection Deadline 7/22/2024, Mediation Due by 6/3/2024. Signed by Honorable Mary Geiger Lewis on 9/22/2023. (cbru, )
|
|
Filing 9
TEXT ORDER: In Defendants' #3 answers to the Local Rule 26.01 Interrogatories, they state this matter arises out of the same accident as in Addison v. Washam, et al, 5:23-cv-04485-MGL. But, the respective complaints list different dates and different people involved. No later than September 29, 2023, Defendants shall reply to this order addressing these discrepancies. IT IS SO ORDERED. (Reply due by 9/29/2023) Signed by Honorable Mary Geiger Lewis on 9/22/2023. (cbru, )
|
|
Filing 8
CLERK'S NOTICE: Attorney Jonathan David Graham is reminded that pursuant to Section 3.4 of the Electronic Case Filing Policies and Procedures "(i)t is the responsibility of all Filing Users to notify the Clerk of Court about a change of name, address, phone number, or facsimile number in a timely manner. It is also the responsibility of all Filing Users to keep their e-mail addresses current in the ECF System". (cbru, )
|
|
Filing 6
TEXT ORDER: The parties' attention is directed to the Court's Standing Order Regarding All Removed Cases Assigned to Judge Mary Geiger Lewis, located on the District Court's website at http://www.scd.uscourts.gov/Forms/Special_Instructions/Lewis_Standing%20_Order_Regarding_Removed_Cases.pdf. Not later than seven days from the entry of this Text Order, Defendant(s) shall file the information mandated by the Order. IT IS SO ORDERED. (Reply due by 9/29/2023) Signed by Honorable Mary Geiger Lewis on 9/22/2023. (cbru, )
|
|
Filing 5
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Herbert Wayne Matthews, Roy Washam, Wayne Matthews Transportation re #1 Notice of Removal, 2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories, #4 Answer to Complaint (cbru, )
|
|
Filing 4
ANSWER to Complaint by Herbert Wayne Matthews, Roy Washam, Wayne Matthews Transportation.(cbru, )
|
|
Filing 3
Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Herbert Wayne Matthews, Roy Washam, Wayne Matthews Transportation.(cbru, )
|
|
Filing 1
NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Orangeburg County Court of Common Pleas, case number 2023-CP-38-01197 (Filing fee $402 receipt number ASCDC-11332646), filed by Roy Washam, Wayne Matthews Transportation, Herbert Wayne Matthews. (Attachments: #1 State Court Documents)(cbru, )
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
