Riches v. Warden, FCI Williamsburg et al
| Jonathan Lee Riches |
| Warden, FCI Williamsburg and John C. McGinley |
| 6:2008cv02257 |
| June 18, 2008 |
| US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| Prison:Prison Condition Office |
| XUS, Outside State |
| William M Catoe |
| Margaret B Seymour |
| None |
| Federal Question |
| 42:1983pr (Other) |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 12, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 27 USCA MANDATE as to 23 Notice of Appeal, filed by Jonathan Lee Riches. (mdoe, ) |
| Filing 26 DISPOSITION ORDER of USCA as to 23 Notice of Appeal, filed by Jonathan Lee Riches. (mdoe, ) |
| Filing 24 Transmittal Sheet for Notice of Appeal to USCA re 23 Notice of Appeal, The Clerk's Office hereby certifies the record and the docket sheet available through ECF to be the certified list in lieu of the record and/or the certified copy of the docket entries. (mdoe, ) |
| ASSEMBLED SUPPLEMENTAL ELECTRONIC RECORD TRANSMITTED TO FOURTH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS re 23 Notice of Appeal, Electronic record successfully transmitted. (mdoe, ) |
| Filing 23 NOTICE OF APPEAL re 20 Order Dismissing Case, - Filing fee $ 455. The Docketing Statement form, Transcript Order form and CJA 24 form may be obtained from the Fourth Circuit website at www.ca4.uscourts.gov. (Attachments: # 1 Envelope)(mdoe, ) |
| Filing 22 ***DOCUMENT MAILED 21 Judgment, and 20 Order Dismissing Case, placed in U.S. Mail to Jonathan Lee Riches (mdoe, ) |
| Filing 21 JUDGMENT the case is dismissed without prejudice. (mdoe, ) |
Filing 20
ORDER DISMISSING CASE without prejudice pursuant to Rule41 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. In addition, Plaintiffs document entitled Motion for Relief from Judgement [docket entryno. 2] is denied. Signed by Honorable Margaret B Seymour on 8/20/08. (mdoe, )
|
| Filing 16 ***DOCUMENT REMAILED 10 Proper Form Order placed in U.S. Mail to Jonathan Lee Riches (mdoe, ) |
| Filing 14 Mail Returned as Undeliverable. Addressee: Jonathan Lee Riches. Document Returned: 10 Proper Form Order (mdoe, ) |
| Filing 12 ***DOCUMENT MAILED 10 Proper Form Order placed in U.S. Mail to Jonathan Lee Riches (mdoe, ) |
|
Filing 10
PROPER FORM ORDER. Case to be brought into proper form by 7/14/2008. Clerk directed to add Ronald Perelman as a defendant. Signed by Magistrate Judge William M Catoe on 6/19/08. (ladd, )
|
| Filing 4 Case transferred in from District of Ohio Southern; Case Number 1:08-cv-00398. Original file with documents numbered 1 - 3, certified copy of transfer order and docket sheet received. |
|
Filing 3
ORDER TRANSFERRING CASE to District of South Carolina. Signed by Magistrate Judge Timothy S Hogan on 6/16/08. (Attachments: # 1 Certified Mail Receipt) (eh1, ) [Transferred from Ohio Southern on 6/18/2008.]
|
| Case transferred to District of South Carolina, Florence Division. Original file, certified copy of transfer order, and docket sheet sent. (eh1, ) [Transferred from Ohio Southern on 6/18/2008.] |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Relief from Judgment by Plaintiff Jonathan Lee Riches. (eh1, ) [Transferred from Ohio Southern on 6/18/2008.] |
| Filing 1 "Habeas Corpus Relief under 28 USC 2241 Inadequate Medical Treatment at FCI Williamsburg" filed by Jonathan Lee Riches against Warden, FCI Williamsburg, John C. McGinley. (eh1, ) [Transferred from Ohio Southern on 6/18/2008.] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
