Workman v. Cooper et al
| Loretta Workman |
| James Cooper, Israel Bailey and Greenville County Sheriff's Office |
| 6:2008cv03429 |
| October 8, 2008 |
| US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| Civil Rights: Other Office |
| Greenville |
| William M Catoe |
| R Bryan Harwell |
| Plaintiff |
| Federal Question |
| 42:1983 Civil Rights Act |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
79
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 74 Report and Recommendations, that Defendants' 62 Motion for Summary Judgment, filed by James Cooper, Israel Bailey, is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. Signed by Honorable Henry F Floyd on 8/6/10. (kmca)
|
|
Filing
24
ORDER adopting 11 Report and Recommendations. It is ordered that defendant Greenville County Sheriff's Office is dismissed without prejudice and without issuance and service of process. The plaintiff shall have twenty (20) days to amend her complaint as to damages sought from defendants Cooper and Bailey. Signed by Honorable Henry F Floyd on 3/16/09. (jtho, )
|
|
Filing
11
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION recommending that defendant Greenville County Sheriff's Office be dismissed without prejudice, and further recommending that the plaintiff be given 20 days to amend her complaint. Objections to R&R due by 11/6/2008. Signed by Magistrate Judge William M Catoe on 10/20/08. (ladd, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
