Robinson v. Astrue
Plaintiff: Benjamin Robinson, Jr
Defendant: Michael J Astrue
Case Number: 6:2008cv03551
Filed: October 21, 2008
Court: US District Court for the District of South Carolina
Office: Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI Office
County: Colleton
Presiding Judge: William M Catoe
Presiding Judge: Margaret B Seymour
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Jury Demanded By: 42:405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 29, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 26 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION recommending the Commissioner's decision be reversed under sentence four of 42 USC 405(g) and the case be remanded for further proceedings. Objections to R&R due by 2/16/2010. Signed by Magistrate Judge William M Catoe on 1/29/10. (ladd, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Robinson v. Astrue
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Benjamin Robinson, Jr
Represented By: Nowell Stanley Lesser
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Michael J Astrue
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?