Myers v. Knowlin
Petitioner: Jerome Myers
Respondent: Gregory Knowlin
Case Number: 6:2009cv01076
Filed: April 27, 2009
Court: US District Court for the District of South Carolina
Office: Greenville Office
County: Richland
Presiding Judge: William M Catoe
Presiding Judge: Cameron McGowan Currie
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 12, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 34 ORDER ADOPTING 26 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS; GRANTING 16 Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Gregory Knowlin, DENYING 23 Motion for Evidentiary Hearing filed by Jerome Myers. Signed by Honorable Cameron McGowan Currie on 3/12/2010. (mbro, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Myers v. Knowlin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Jerome Myers
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Gregory Knowlin
Represented By: Donald John Zelenka
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?