Monster Daddy LLC v. Monster Cable Products Inc
Monster Daddy LLC |
Monster Cable Products Inc |
6:2010cv01170 |
May 7, 2010 |
US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
Greenville Office |
Greenville |
Henry M Herlong |
Trademark |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1114 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 460 OPINION AND ORDER granting 445 Motion for Attorney Fees as set out. Signed by Honorable Mary G Lewis on 1/16/15.(alew, ) |
Filing 458 ORDER denying 429 Motion for Reconsideration re 428 Order on Motion for Attorney Fees. Signed by Honorable Mary G Lewis on 11/21/14.(alew, ) |
Filing 434 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 383 Motion for Attorney Fees as set out. Signed by Honorable Mary G Lewis on 6/19/14.(alew, ) |
Filing 428 ORDER and OPINION granting 267 Motion for Attorney Fees as set out. Signed by Honorable Mary G Lewis on 3/19/14.(alew, ) |
Filing 401 ORDER denying 389 Motion for Reconsideration ; denying 389 Motion for New Trial. Signed by Honorable Mary G Lewis on 12/6/13.(alew, ) |
Filing 377 OPINION AND ORDER finding as moot 345 Motion for Default Judgment; order as set out. Signed by Honorable Mary G Lewis on 9/30/13.(alew, ) |
Filing 305 OPINION AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 256 Motion for Reconsideration ; granting 280 Motion for Reconsideration as set out. Signed by Honorable Mary G Lewis on 7/2/2013.(mbro) |
Filing 85 OPINION and ORDER DENYING Monster Daddy's 77 Motion to Dismiss or in the alternative strike, Monster Cable Products, Inc.s amended counterclaim and affirmative defenses pursuant to Rules 12(b)(6) and (f) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Signed by Honorable Henry M Herlong, Jr on 2/7/11.(sfla) Modified on 2/7/2011 to add "opinion" (sfla). |
Filing 68 OPINION and ORDER granting in part and denying in part as set out 40 Motion to Dismiss; denying 53 Motion for Sanctions; granting in part and denying in part as set out 59 Motion to Dismiss. Monster Cable is granted leave to amend and correct within 10 days the deficient pleading of its fraud claim and affirmative defenses. Signed by Honorable Henry M Herlong, Jr on 11/23/10.(sfla) |
Filing 57 ORDER re 40 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Monster Daddy LLC, that the defendant shall file supplemental briefing within 10 days of this order as to whether Defendant's affirmative defenses are sufficiently pled, (Specific Document due by 10/28/2010). Signed by Honorable Henry M Herlong, Jr on 10/18/10. (sfla) |
Filing 54 OPINION and ORDER denying 37 Motion for Reconsideration. Signed by Honorable Henry M Herlong, Jr on 9/29/10.(sfla) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Monster Daddy LLC v. Monster Cable Products Inc | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Monster Daddy LLC | |
Represented By: | Matthew David McCord |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Monster Cable Products Inc | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.