Bautista-Serrano v. Mitchell
Petitioner: Emilio Bautista-Serrano
Respondent: Mary Mitchell
Case Number: 6:2011cv01351
Filed: June 9, 2011
Court: US District Court for the District of South Carolina
Office: Greenville Office
County: Edgefield
Presiding Judge: R Bryan Harwell
Presiding Judge: Kevin McDonald
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 12, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 19 ORDER ADOPTING 8 Report and Recommendations; DENYING 17 Motion for Extension of Time filed by Emilio Bautista-Serrano; and the instant Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241, is DISMISSED without prejudice and without issuance and service of process upon Respondent. Signed by Honorable R Bryan Harwell on 9/12/2011. (mbro, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Bautista-Serrano v. Mitchell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Mary Mitchell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Emilio Bautista-Serrano
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?