Cox v. McCabe
Petitioner: Terrence Cox
Respondent: Wayne McCabe
Case Number: 6:2011cv01535
Filed: June 24, 2011
Court: US District Court for the District of South Carolina
Office: Greenville Office
County: Dorchester
Presiding Judge: Cameron McGowan Currie
Presiding Judge: Kevin McDonald
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 16, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 38 ORDER RULING ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION for 26 Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Wayne McCabe, 32 Report and Recommendation. Respondents motion for summary judgment is granted and this petition is dismissed withprejudice. A certificate of Appealability is denied. Signed by Honorable Cameron McGowan Currie on 8/16/2012. (kric, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Cox v. McCabe
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Terrence Cox
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Wayne McCabe
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?