Cutner v. Wilson et al
Lamont Cutner |
Michael Marshal, Sgt Simmons, Sgt Wilson and K Harrington |
6:2012cv02544 |
September 6, 2012 |
US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
Greenville Office |
Dorchester |
Kevin McDonald |
G Ross Anderson |
Prison Condition |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 108 ORDER RULING ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION for 105 . The Plaintiffs motion to dismiss this case is GRANTED, and Plaintiffs claims are DISMISSED without prejudice. Signed by Honorable G Ross Anderson, Jr on 10/8/2013. (kric, ) |
Filing 99 ORDER RULING ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 90 . The Plaintiffs motion to dismiss Defendants Marshal and Harrington from this action is GRANTED.IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants motions to dismiss (ECF Nos.68 & 90) are DENIED AS MOOT. Signed by Honorable G Ross Anderson, Jr on 7/15/2013. (kric, ) |
Filing 73 ORDER RULING ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 56 . Plaintiffs Motion for Default Judgment is DENIED. Signed by Honorable G Ross Anderson, Jr on 3/13/2013. (kric, ) Modified on 3/13/2013 to correct linkage (kric, ). |
Filing 61 ORDER ACCEPTING 48 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION that Plaintiff's 39 Motion for Default is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant's 40 Motion for Extension of Time to File Responsive Pleadings is GRANTED. Defendants have until March 25, 2013 to file their answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint. Signed by Honorable G Ross Anderson, Jr on 3/8/13. (kmca) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.