Jordan v. Hooks et al
| Kenneth Morice Jordan |
| Shawntele Hooks, Levern Cohen, John Wiggins, Gary Eichenberg, Monique Capers and Sgt Mole |
| 6:2013cv02247 |
| August 26, 2013 |
| US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| Greenville Office |
| Allendale |
| Kevin McDonald |
| Terry L Wooten |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
163
ORDER RULING ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 155 . It is therefore ORDERED that the defendants motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 133) is denied with regard to the Eighth Amendment claim and granted with regard to all other claims. Signed by Honorable Bruce Howe Hendricks on 9/29/2015. (kric, )
|
|
Filing
120
ORDER RULING ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS 38 , 116 . The plaintiffs motion to appoint counsel (ECF No. 119) is also DENIED for the reasons set forth in Judge McDonalds Order (ECF No. 58) dated January 7, 2014. This case is hereby stayed under the Service members Civil Relief Act ("SCRA"), 50 App. U.S.C. § 501. Counsel for the defendant are required to update the Court of Cpl.Hooks deployment status every sixty days. This matter is returned to the Magistrate Judge for further pretrial proceedings./s/Bruce Howe Hendricks Signed by Honorable Bruce Howe Hendricks on 10/16/2014. (kric, ) Modified on 10/16/2014 to edit text(kric, ).
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
