Whitmore v. Mauney

Whitmore v. Mauney

Petitioner:	Kenneth Whitmore
Respondent:	R H Mauney
Case Number:	6:2013cv03217
Filed:	November 26, 2013
Court:	US District Court for the District of South Carolina
Office:	Greenville Office
County:	Greenville
Presiding Judge:	J Michelle Childs
Presiding Judge:	Kevin McDonald
Nature of Suit:	General
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
September 19, 2014	Filing 53 ORDER RULING ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 48 . The court ACCEPTS the Report of the magistrate judge (ECF No. 48). It is therefore ordered that Respondents Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 23) is GRANTED and Petitioners Mo tion to be Released or Moved (ECF No. 16), Motion for More Definite Statement (ECF No. 29), Motion for Relief from Judgment under Rule 60(b)(2)(3)(4) (ECF No. 40), and Motion for Relief from Judgment or Order under Rule 60(b)(4) (ECF No. 41) are DENIED and this action (ECF No. 1) is DISMISSED. A certificate of appealability is denied. Signed by Honorable J Michelle Childs on 9/19/2014. (kric, )

Date Filed

Document Text

September 19, 2014

Filing 53 ORDER RULING ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 48 . The court ACCEPTS the Report of the magistrate judge (ECF No. 48). It is therefore ordered that Respondents Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 23) is GRANTED and Petitioners Mo tion to be Released or Moved (ECF No. 16), Motion for More Definite Statement (ECF No. 29), Motion for Relief from Judgment under Rule 60(b)(2)(3)(4) (ECF No. 40), and Motion for Relief from Judgment or Order under Rule 60(b)(4) (ECF No. 41) are DENIED and this action (ECF No. 1) is DISMISSED. A certificate of appealability is denied. Signed by Honorable J Michelle Childs on 9/19/2014. (kric, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Whitmore v. Mauney
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: Kenneth Whitmore
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: R H Mauney
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?