Williams v. National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh PA et al
| Ralph Williams |
| National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh PA, American International Group Inc, HealthExtras Inc, HealthExtras LLC, HealthExtras Benefits Administrators Inc, Catamaran Health Solutions LLC, HealthExtras Insurance Agency Inc, Alliant Insurance Services Inc, Alliant Services Houston Inc, Alliant Insurance Services Houston LLC and Virginia Surety Company Inc |
| 6:2014cv00870 |
| March 12, 2014 |
| US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| Greenville Office |
| Greenville |
| Mary G Lewis |
| Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations |
| 18 U.S.C. ยง 1961 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
113
OPINION AND ORDER denying 66 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim; denying 67 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim; denying 68 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim; denying 69 Motion t o Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim; denying 73 Motion to Stay. The plaintiff is ordered to submit supplemental briefing on the issue of whether the McCarran Ferguson Act preempts the plaintiffs RICO claims within thirty (30) days of this Order. The defendants will then have 14 days to respond if they wish to do so. Signed by Honorable Bruce Howe Hendricks on 3/31/2015.(abuc)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
