Kemp v. JHM Hotels LLC
Plaintiff: P David Kemp
Defendant: JHM Hotels LLC
Case Number: 6:2014cv02604
Filed: June 26, 2014
Court: US District Court for the District of South Carolina
Office: Greenville Office
County: Greenville
Presiding Judge: Kevin McDonald
Presiding Judge: G Ross Anderson
Nature of Suit: Employment
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 12117
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 7, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 70 ORDER adopting 54 Report and Recommendation. Defendant's 33 Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part as set out. Signed by Honorable Timothy M Cain on 3/7/16. (kmca) (Main Document 70 replaced on 3/7/2016: to correct typo - Defendant's name per attorney request) (kmca).
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Kemp v. JHM Hotels LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: P David Kemp
Represented By: John Plyler Mann, Jr
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: JHM Hotels LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?