Hause v. AstraZeneca
Plaintiff: Nacole Hause
Defendant: AstraZeneca
Case Number: 6:2014cv04090
Filed: October 21, 2014
Court: US District Court for the District of South Carolina
Office: Greenville Office
County: Greenville
Presiding Judge: Timothy M Cain
Presiding Judge: Kevin McDonald
Nature of Suit: Employment
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 2, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 35 ORDER adopting 29 Report and Recommendation. It is ORDERED that AstraZeneca's 11 Motion to dismiss that was converted into a Motion for summary judgment is GRANTED. Plaintiff's 28 33 Motions for a hearing are DENIED. Signed by Honorable Timothy M Cain on 4/2/15. (kmca)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Hause v. AstraZeneca
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Nacole Hause
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: AstraZeneca
Represented By: Charles Edgar McDonald, III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?