Brailsford v. Eagleton et al
Petitioner: Ikeef Brailsford
Respondent: Willie Eagleton
Case Number: 6:2015cv01800
Filed: April 30, 2015
Court: US District Court for the District of South Carolina
Office: Greenville Office
County: Sumter
Presiding Judge: Kevin McDonald
Presiding Judge: G Ross Anderson
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 6, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 44 ORDER RULING ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 39 . Respondents motion for summary judgement is GRANTED; and Petitioners § 2254 petition is DISMISSED. The Court declines to issue a certificate of appealability in this matter. Signed by Honorable G Ross Anderson, Jr on 11/6/2015. (kric, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Brailsford v. Eagleton et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Ikeef Brailsford
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Willie Eagleton
Represented By: Donald John Zelenka
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?