Hewins v. Loftis et al
| Erick Elton Hewins |
| Derick Loftis, Joyce Montz, Charles Cothran and Greenville City Police Department |
| 6:2015cv04320 |
| October 22, 2015 |
| US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| Greenville Office |
| Greenville |
| Jacquelyn D Austin |
| G Ross Anderson |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
77
ORDER RULING ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION adopting 53 Report and Recommendation. Plaintiff's 30 motion for summary judgment and 46 Defendants' motion for summary judgment are DENIED. Defendants' 67 moti on to amend their answer to assert the statute of limitations as an affirmative defense is DENIED and Defendants motion to amend to assert the statutory cap on attorneys fees under the PLRA is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE with leave to refile. Counsel for the parties shall submit to the Court a joint proposed consent amended scheduling order no later than August 2, 1016. Cothran, Signed by Honorable Mary Geiger Lewis on 7/28/2016. (gpre, )
|
|
Filing
24
ORDER adopting 18 Report and Recommendation. Defendants Joyce Montz and Greenville City Police Department are dismissed from this action without prejudice and without issuance and service of process. The lawsuit remains pending against the other Defendants at this time. Signed by Honorable Mary Geiger Lewis on 1/15/2016.(abuc)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
