Williams v. Dillon County Detention Center Officers

Justia Dockets & Filings Fourth Circuit South Carolina District Court Williams v. Dillon County Detention Center Officers

Williams v. Dillon County Detention Center Officers

Plaintiff:	Webster D Williams, III
Defendant:	Dillon County Detention Center Officers
Case Number:	6:2016cv01236
Filed:	April 20, 2016
Court:	US District Court for the District of South Carolina
Office:	Greenville Office
County:	XUS, Outside State
Presiding Judge:	Richard M Gergel
Presiding Judge:	Kevin McDonald
Nature of Suit:	Prison Condition
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
September 20, 2017	Filing 100 ORDER RULING ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 86 . Defendants' motion for summary judgment is granted in part and denied in part. (Dkt. No. 38.) Plaintiffs allegations against Defendant Barfield for deliberate indifference and retaliation are sufficient to survive summary judgment.(Dkt. No. 86 at 12-13.) Defendant Dillon County is dismissed because it is not a proper party to this suit. Defendants' motion for summary judgment is granted as to all other clai ms. Also for the reasons discussed above, Plaintiffs motion for summary judgment is denied. (Dkt. No. 69.) The record reveals a genuine dispute of material fact about Plaintiffs deliberate indifference and retaliation claims against Defendant Barfield that must be submitted to a fact-finder. Signed by Honorable Richard M Gergel on 9/19/2017. (kric, ) Modified on 9/20/2017 to edit text (kric, ).

Date Filed

Document Text

September 20, 2017

Filing 100 ORDER RULING ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 86 . Defendants' motion for summary judgment is granted in part and denied in part. (Dkt. No. 38.) Plaintiffs allegations against Defendant Barfield for deliberate indifference and retaliation are sufficient to survive summary judgment.(Dkt. No. 86 at 12-13.) Defendant Dillon County is dismissed because it is not a proper party to this suit. Defendants' motion for summary judgment is granted as to all other clai ms. Also for the reasons discussed above, Plaintiffs motion for summary judgment is denied. (Dkt. No. 69.) The record reveals a genuine dispute of material fact about Plaintiffs deliberate indifference and retaliation claims against Defendant Barfield that must be submitted to a fact-finder. Signed by Honorable Richard M Gergel on 9/19/2017. (kric, ) Modified on 9/20/2017 to edit text (kric, ).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Williams v. Dillon County Detention Center Officers
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Webster D Williams, III
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Dillon County Detention Center Officers
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?