United States of America v. Brooks et al
| United States of America |
| Dennis D Brooks, Barbara D Brooks, Greenville County Tax Collector, Coach Hills Homeowner's Association Inc and South Carolina Department of Revenue |
| 6:2017cv02010 |
| July 28, 2017 |
| US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| Greenville Office |
| Greenville |
| Timothy M Cain |
| Taxes (US Plaintiff or Defendant) |
| 26 U.S.C. ยง 7402 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
173
ORDER that the court finds that Dennis Brooks is liable for the unpaid tax assessments against him. Accordingly, the court adopts 160 Report and Recommendation and GRANTS the Government's 111 Motion for Summary Judgment. The Government is to submit a proposed order within 21 days consistent with this order to effectuate the foreclosure and sale of the Subject Property. Signed by Honorable Timothy M Cain on 2/15/19. (kmca)
|
|
Filing
138
ORDER RULING ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION adopts in part 114 Report and Recommendation. The court adopts the portion of the magistrate judges Report that recommends that the Plaintiff be granted default judgment establishing that Defendant Coach Hills has no interest in, and can take nothing from, any sale of the property described in the complaint. Signed by Honorable Timothy M Cain on 11/16/2018. (gpre, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
