Marshall v. United Partail Service

Marshall v. United Partail Service

Plaintiff:	Maurice Antowan Marshall
Defendant:	United Partail Service
Case Number:	6:2017cv03491
Filed:	December 28, 2017
Court:	US District Court for the District of South Carolina
Office:	Greenville Office
County:	Greenville
Presiding Judge:	Bristow Marchant
Presiding Judge:	Donald C Coggins
Nature of Suit:	Employment
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 2000
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
March 31, 2020	Filing 61 OPINION AND ORDER adopting 56 Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Bristow Marchant, and Defendant's 48 Motion to Dismiss, is Granted in Part and Denied in Part. Signed by Honorable Donald C Coggins, Jr on 03/31/2020.(cpeg, )
February 22, 2019	Filing 40 ORDER adopting in part 35 Report and Recommendations of Magistrate Judge Bristow Marchant. Plaintiff is directed to file an Amended Complaint to correct the defects identified above within 15 days of this Order. If Plaintif f fails to file an amended complaint, this action will be subject to dismissal for failure to prosecute and failure to comply with an Order of this Court. The Court adopts in part the Report to the extent it recommends allowing Plaintiff to amend his Complaint. The remainder of the Report is held in abeyance. Defendant's Motion to Dismiss is held in abeyance. Signed by Honorable Donald C Coggins, Jr on 02/22/2019. (egra, )

Date Filed

Document Text

March 31, 2020

Filing 61 OPINION AND ORDER adopting 56 Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Bristow Marchant, and Defendant's 48 Motion to Dismiss, is Granted in Part and Denied in Part. Signed by Honorable Donald C Coggins, Jr on 03/31/2020.(cpeg, )

February 22, 2019

Filing 40 ORDER adopting in part 35 Report and Recommendations of Magistrate Judge Bristow Marchant. Plaintiff is directed to file an Amended Complaint to correct the defects identified above within 15 days of this Order. If Plaintif f fails to file an amended complaint, this action will be subject to dismissal for failure to prosecute and failure to comply with an Order of this Court. The Court adopts in part the Report to the extent it recommends allowing Plaintiff to amend his Complaint. The remainder of the Report is held in abeyance. Defendant's Motion to Dismiss is held in abeyance. Signed by Honorable Donald C Coggins, Jr on 02/22/2019. (egra, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Marshall v. United Partail Service
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Maurice Antowan Marshall
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: United Partail Service
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?