Williams v. Cash America et al
Reggie Mandell Williams |
Cash America, Brain Brook and Roger Iverson |
6:2018cv00405 |
February 12, 2018 |
US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
Greenville Office |
Greenville |
Timothy M Cain |
Kevin McDonald |
Employment |
42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 66 ORDER Adopting 61 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. The court GRANTS in part and denies in part Defendants' 30 Motion to Dismiss. Specifically, the Motion to Dismiss is granted with prejudice as to Defendant Iverson and is granted as to any claims against Cash America predating September 12, 2016. The Motion is denied in all other respects. Furthermore, the alternative 30 Motion to Stay Pending Arbitration is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. To the extent that the Motion to Stay Pending Arbitration seeks to compel arbitration, the motion is granted. However, the motion is denied in all other respects, because the court finds it appropriate to dismiss without prejudice the case against Cash America pending arbitration, because the only remaining claims are arbitrable. Accordingly, the remaining claims against Defendant Cash America are DISMISSED without prejudice pending arbitration. Signed by Honorable Timothy M Cain on 11/19/18. (kmca) |
Filing 58 ORDER RULING ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 51 . Defendant Brain Brook is DISMISSED as a defendant in this case. Signed by Honorable Timothy M Cain on 7/26/2018. (kric, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.