Chisolm et al v. South Carolina Department of Corrections et al
| Donsurvi Chisolm, Alvin Davis, Craig E Ellerbe, Jr, Johnell Richardson, Delronzey Washington, Jason Storms and Jamarcus Murray |
| South Carolina Department of Corrections, Leroy Cartledge and Michael Stephan |
| 6:2018cv01150 |
| April 26, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| Greenville Office |
| McCormick |
| Richard M Gergel |
| Kevin McDonald |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
42
ORDER RULING ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION for 22 Motion for Summary Judgment, filed by Leroy Cartledge, Michael Stephan, South Carolina Department of Corrections, 34 Report and Recommendation. Defendants' motion for summary judgment (Dkt. No. 22) is GRANTED as to Plaintiffs Chisolm's and Davis's three claims brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiffs Chisolm's and Davis's remaining claim for violation of the South Carolina T ort Claims Act is REMANDED to the Court of Common Pleas of McCormick County, South Carolina. Defendants' motion for summary judgment is DENIED as to Plaintiffs Ellerbe, Richardson, Washington, Storms and Murray and the action is REFERRED BACK to the Magistrate Judge for pre-trial proceedings. Signed by Honorable Richard M Gergel on 2/5/2019. (kric, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
