Scruggs v. TD Bank US Holding Company et al
Alisa Scruggs |
TD Bank NA and TD Bank US Holding Company |
6:2018cv01989 |
July 20, 2018 |
US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
Greenville Office |
Greenville |
Jacquelyn D Austin |
Timothy M Cain |
A Marvin Quattlebaum |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 13, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by TD Bank US Holding Company.(Asper, Lucas) |
Filing 9 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by TD Bank NA.(Asper, Lucas) |
Filing 8 ANSWER to #1 Complaint by TD Bank NA, TD Bank US Holding Company.(Asper, Lucas) |
Filing 7 NOTICE OF CHANGE OF CASE NUMBER to 6:18-cv-1989-TMC-JDA. Please use the new case number Judge initials on all future filings. (gpre, ) |
Filing 6 Case Reassigned to Judge Honorable Timothy M Cain. Judge Honorable A Marvin Quattlebaum, Jr no longer assigned to the case. (cwil, ) |
Filing 5 LETTER EXTENDING TIME TO ANSWER TD Bank US Holding Company answer due 9/13/2018; TD Bank NA answer due 9/13/2018. (Asper, Lucas) |
Filing 4 Summons Issued as to TD Bank NA, TD Bank US Holding Company. (gpre, ) |
Filing 3 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Alisa Scruggs.(gpre, ) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against TD Bank NA, TD Bank US Holding Company ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 04207897493.), filed by Alisa Scruggs. Service due by 10/17/2018(gpre, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.