Moreno v. Calder Brothers Corporation
| Wilson Moreno |
| Calder Brothers Corporation |
| 6:2018cv02085 |
| July 30, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| Greenville Office |
| Greenville |
| Henry M Herlong |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 201 |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 25, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 12
SCHEDULING ORDER; Rule 26(f) Conference Deadline 10/15/2018, 26(a) Initial Disclosures due by 10/29/2018, Rule 26 Report due by 10/29/2018, Motions to Amend Pleadings due by 2/20/2019, Plaintiffs ID of Expert Witness due by 3/22/2019, Defendants ID of Expert Witnesses Due by 4/23/2019, Records Custodian Affidavit due by 4/23/2019, Discovery due by 5/23/2019, Motion in Limine due by 8/6/2019, Motions due by 6/6/2019, Rule 26(a)(3) Disclosures due by 7/19/2019, Pretrial Briefs due by 8/13/2019, Jury Selection Deadline 8/20/2019. Signed by Honorable Henry M Herlong, Jr on 9/25/18. (sfla)
|
| Filing 11 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Calder Brothers Corporation.(Bridges, Emily) |
| Filing 10 ANSWER to #1 Complaint by Calder Brothers Corporation.(Bridges, Emily) |
| Filing 9 TEXT ORDER granting #7 Consent Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. Calder Brothers Corporation answer due 9/24/2018. Entered by Honorable Henry M Herlong, Jr on August 21, 2018. (bedw) |
| Filing 7 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint by Calder Brothers Corporation. Response to Motion due by 9/4/2018. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. No proposed order.(Bridges, Emily) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Emily Irene Bridges on behalf of Calder Brothers Corporation (Bridges, Emily) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Wilson Moreno. Calder Brothers Corporation served on 8/2/2018, answer due 8/23/2018. (Attachments: #1 Supporting Documents PS Form 3811 - Calder Brothers Corporation)(Stephenson, Thomas) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Calder Brothers Corporation. (sfla) |
| Filing 3 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Wilson Moreno.(sfla) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Calder Brothers Corporation ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0420-7914350) filed by Wilson Moreno. Service due by 10/29/2018(sfla) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Moreno v. Calder Brothers Corporation | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Wilson Moreno | |
| Represented By: | Brian P Murphy |
| Represented By: | Thomas L Stephenson |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Calder Brothers Corporation | |
| Represented By: | Natalma M McKnew |
| Represented By: | Emily Irene Bridges |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
