Busha v. SC Department of Mental Health
| Teresa Busha |
| SC Department of Mental Health |
| 6:2018cv02337 |
| August 22, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| Donald C Coggins |
| Kaymani D West |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2003 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 29, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 REPLY to Response to Motion re #4 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM Response filed by SC Department of Mental Health. (Hodges, Robert) |
| Filing 9 RESPONSE in Opposition re #4 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM Response filed by Teresa Busha.Reply to Response to Motion due by 10/10/2018 Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - 6-26-2017 Pre-termination Notice, #2 Exhibit 6-28-2017 PEBA forms from Defendant's Benefit Manager, #3 Exhibit 8-4-2017 Notice of termination)(Kern-Fuller, Candy) |
Filing 7
TEXT ORDER: Defendant filed a Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint in this counseled employment case on August 28, 2018. Plaintiff's response was due September 11, 2018, but no response has been filed. If Plaintiff intends to pursue this case, she must so advise the court and submit a response to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss no later than October 3, 2018. If no response is received by that date, the undersigned may recommend this matter be dismissed for failure to prosecute. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kaymani D West on 9/19/2018. (prou, )
|
| Filing 4 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by SC Department of Mental Health. Response to Motion due by 9/11/2018. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. (Attachments: #1 Memo in Support)No proposed order.Motions referred to Kaymani D West.(Hodges, Robert) |
| Filing 3 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by SC Department of Mental Health.(prou, ) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Greenville County Common Pleas, case number 2018-CP-23-04125. (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0420-7957847), filed by SC Department of Mental Health. (Attachments: #1 State Court Documents)(prou, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Busha v. SC Department of Mental Health | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Teresa Busha | |
| Represented By: | Candy Kern-Fuller |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: SC Department of Mental Health | |
| Represented By: | Robert Hayne Hodges, III |
| Represented By: | Lillian Marshall Colema Newton |
| Represented By: | Lillian Marshall Coleman Newton |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
