Todd v. Joyner et al
| Jerome Eugene Todd |
| Warden Hector Joyner and US Marshal Service |
| 6:2018cv03087 |
| November 14, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| Kevin McDonald |
| Margaret B Seymour |
| Mandamus & Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1361 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 27, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 ***DOCUMENT MAILED #9 Judgment, #8 Order placed in U.S. Mail to Jerome Eugene Todd. (abuc) |
| Filing 9 JUDGMENT / The court has ordered that this action is dismissed without prejudice pursuant to Rule 41 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (abuc) |
Filing 8
ORDER dismissing #1 case without prejudice pursuant to the Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41. Signed by Honorable Margaret B Seymour on 12/27/2018. (abuc)
|
| Filing 6 ***DOCUMENT MAILED #5 Proper Form Order, placed in U.S. Mail to Jerome Eugene Todd (kric, ) |
|
Filing 5
PROPER FORM ORDER Case to be brought into proper form by 12/10/18. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kevin McDonald on 11/19/18. (ctuc, )
|
| Filing 2 TRUE DIVISION FOR TRIAL: Beaufort. (kric, ) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Mandamus, filed by Jerome Eugene Todd. (Attachments: #1 Supporting Documents, #2 Envelope)(kric, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
