Cole v. 3M Pension Plan et al
William M Cole |
3M Pension Plan and 3M Company |
6:2018cv03468 |
December 17, 2018 |
US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
Timothy M Cain |
Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
29 U.S.C. ยง 1132 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 8, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by 3M Company, 3M Pension Plan.(Quattlebaum, James) |
Filing 6 MOTION to Dismiss by 3M Company, 3M Pension Plan. Response to Motion due by 2/22/2019. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. (Attachments: #1 Memo in Support, #2 Exhibit A - ERIP 2016 Restatement, #3 Exhibit B - 2016 SPD 3M ERIP - Former Emloyees)No proposed order.(Quattlebaum, James) |
Filing 5 LETTER EXTENDING TIME TO ANSWER 3M Company answer due 2/8/2019; 3M Pension Plan answer due 2/8/2019. (Quattlebaum, James) |
Filing 4 Summons Issued as to 3M Company, 3M Pension Plan. (kmca) |
Filing 3 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by William M Cole.(kmca) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against 3M Company, 3M Pension Plan (Filing fee $400 receipt number 0420-8163379), filed by William M Cole. Service due by 3/18/2019. (Attachments: #1 A - 3m 1983 pension letter: 3M Pension Plan vested certificate, #2 B - April 5, 2016 letter, 3M April 28 response letter, #3 C - July 22, 2016 letter to 3M, #4 D - November 13, 2019 Counsel letter to 3M)(kmca) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.