Todd v. US Deparatment of Justice et al
| Jerome Eugene Todd |
| Clerk of Court Kathy Rich, US Marshals Service, US Deparatment of Justice and US Department of Justice |
| 6:2018cv03533 |
| December 20, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| Kevin McDonald |
| Margaret B Seymour |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. § 2241 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 6, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 19 ***DOCUMENT MAILED #18 Judgment, #17 Order Dismissing Case placed in U.S. Mail to Jerome Eugene Todd (kric, ) |
| Filing 18 JUDGMENT dismissing the action without prejudice. (kric, ) |
Filing 17
ORDER DISMISSING CASE without prejudice for failure to comply with proper form order. Signed by Honorable Margaret B Seymour on 2/5/2019. (kric, )
|
| Filing 16 ***DOCUMENT MAILED #15 Order on Motion #11 Motion to Hold in Abeyance and #12 Motion to modify a consent decree, placed in U.S. Mail to Jerome Eugene Todd (kric, ) |
|
Filing 15
ORDER denying #11 Motion to Hold in Abeyance Habeas Proceeding and #12 Motion to Modify a Consent Decree as premature. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kevin McDonald on 2/4/19.(ctuc, )
|
| Filing 13 NOTICE of Change of Address by Jerome Eugene Todd. Address updated (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(kric, ) |
| Filing 12 MOTION modify a consent decree by Jerome Eugene Todd. Response to Motion due by 2/11/2019. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. (Attachments: #1 cover letter, #2 Envelope)No proposed order.Motions referred to Kevin McDonald.(kric, ) (Attachment 1 replaced on 1/29/2019) (kric, ). |
| Filing 11 MOTION Hold Habeas Petition in Abeyance by Jerome Eugene Todd. Response to Motion due by 2/11/2019. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. (Attachments: #1 cover letter, #2 Envelope)No proposed order.Motions referred to Kevin McDonald.(kric, ) (Attachment 1 replaced on 1/29/2019) (kric, ). |
| Filing 10 ***DOCUMENT MAILED 9 Order on Motion for Miscellaneous Relief, placed in U.S. Mail to Jerome Eugene Todd at Estill and Marianna addresses (kric, ) |
|
Filing 9
TEXT ORDER As this case is not in proper form, the petitioner's #2 Motion for the Court to Take Judicial Notice is denied as premature. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kevin McDonald on 1/7/19.(ctuc, )
|
| Filing 7 ***DOCUMENT MAILED #6 Proper Form Order, placed in U.S. Mail to Jerome Eugene Todd with AO240 application at both Estill and Marianna locations as directed. (kric, ) |
|
Filing 6
PROPER FORM ORDER Case to be brought into proper form by 1/25/19. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kevin McDonald on 1/4/19. (ctuc, )
|
| Filing 3 TRUE DIVISION FOR TRIAL: Greenville. (abuc) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for the Court to Take Judicial Notice by Jerome Eugene Todd. Response to Motion due by 1/3/2019. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)Motions referred to Kevin McDonald.(abuc) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Jerome Eugene Todd. (Attachments: #1 Administrative Remedy Generalized Retrieval, #2 Envelope)(abuc) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
