Whitfield v. Cannon et al
Divine Naquann Whitfield and Shawn Sinclair |
Sheriff Al Cannon and Charleston County Detention Center |
6:2019cv01354 |
May 9, 2019 |
US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
Richard M Gergel |
Kevin McDonald |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 15, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 18 ***DOCUMENT MAILED 17 Order, placed in U.S. Mail from Greenville Clerks Office to Shawn Sinclair 48409 Charleston County Detention Center 3841 Leeds Avenue Charleston, SC 29405 (kric, ) |
Filing 17 TEXT ORDER directing the petitioner that the objections to the Report and Recommendation are due by 7/5/2019 and should be titled "Objections to the Report and Recommendation". Signed by Honorable Richard M Gergel on 6/21/2019. (kric, ) |
Filing 16 ***DOCUMENT RE-MAILED at the direction of chambers #8 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Divine Naquann Whitfield placed in U.S. Mail from Greenville Clerks Office to Shawn Sinclair 48409 Charleston County Detention Center 3841 Leeds Avenue Charleston, SC 29405. Objections deadline reset for 7/5/2019, 14 days from the date of re-mailing. (kric, ) |
Filing 15 Additional Attachments to Main Document #11 Objection to Report and Recommendation,. First attachment description: cover letter. (Attachments: #1 Affidavits, #2 Envelope)(kric, ) |
Filing 14 Letter from Divine Whitfield regarding mail (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(kric, ) |
Filing 11 OBJECTION to #8 Report and Recommendation by Divine Naquann Whitfield. Reply to Objections due by 7/1/2019 Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A Probation Memorandum, #2 Note regarding case numbers, #3 Envelope) See additional attachments #15 . (kric, ) Modified on 6/20/2019 to add linkage and edit text (kric, ). |
Filing 10 CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT re #7 Order 2241 County Service, served on US Attorney General on 6/6/2019. (kric, ) |
Filing 9 ***DOCUMENT MAILED #7 Order 2241 County Service, #8 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Divine Naquann Whitfield placed in U.S. Mail to Divine Naquann Whitfield. #7 order mailed certified #7015 3430 0000 7276 3864 (kric, ) |
Filing 8 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION recommending that the petitioner's 2241 petition be dismissed without requiring the respondent to file a return. IT IS SO RECOMMENDED. Objections to R&R due by 6/14/19. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kevin McDonald on 5/31/19. (ctuc, ) |
Filing 7 ORDER authorizing service of process by clerk. Directing petitioner to notify the clerk in writing of any change of address. The respondent shall not file an answer to the petition because the petition is subject to summary dismissal. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kevin McDonald on 5/31/19. (Attachments: #1 2241 petition)(ctuc, ) |
Filing 5 Additional Attachments to Main Document #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. First attachment description: Probation Memorandum. (Attachments: #1 cover letter)(kric, ) |
Filing 2 TRUE DIVISION FOR TRIAL: Charleston. (kric, ) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus ( Filing fee $ 5.00 Receipt number SCX200016365.), filed by Divine Naquann Whitfield. See additional attachment #5 (kric, ) Modified on 5/15/2019 to add linkage and edit text(kric, ). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.