Notarmuzi v. Costco Wholesale Corporation
| Margo Notarmuzi |
| Costco Wholesale Corporation |
| 6:2019cv02653 |
| September 19, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| Donald C Coggins |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 4, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Margo Notarmuzi.(Jordan, William) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE OF RESCHEDULED PRETRIAL TELEPHONE CONFERENCE for 11/18/2019 10:00 AM cancelled and rescheduled to: Pretrial Telephone Conference set for 11/20/2019 10:00 AM before Honorable Donald C Coggins Jr. Plaintiff's counsel is directed to arrange and initiate the conference call, conference in all other participating counsel, and then connect to chambers at 864-591-5340(abuc) |
Filing 9
ORDER AND NOTICE SETTING PRETRIAL TELEPHONE CONFERENCE for 11/18/2019 10:00 AM before Honorable Donald C Coggins Jr. Plaintiff's counsel is directed to arrange and initiate the conference call, conference in all other participating counsel, and then connect to chambers at 864-591-5340. Signed by Honorable Donald C Coggins, Jr on 9/23/2019. (abuc)
|
| Filing 8 CONFERENCE AND SCHEDULING ORDER Rule 26(f) Conference Deadline 10/15/2019, Motions to Amend Pleadings due by 12/9/2019, Plaintiffs ID of Expert Witness due by 1/2/2020, Defendants ID of Expert Witnesses Due by 1/31/2020, Records Custodian Affidavit due by 2/20/2020, Discovery due by 3/23/2020, Motion in Limine due by 5/20/2020, Motions due by 4/6/2020, Rule 26(a)(3) Disclosures due by 5/29/2020, Jury Selection Deadline 6/19/2020, Mediation Due by 4/20/2020, Signed by Honorable Donald C Coggins, Jr on 9/23/2019. (abuc) |
| Filing 7 ANSWER to Complaint by Costco Wholesale Corporation.(Harte, Robert) |
| Filing 6 OBJECTIONS by Costco Wholesale Corporation. (Harte, Robert) |
| Filing 5 CLERK'S NOTICE: Plaintiff is directed to file their Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories no later than 10/3/2019. (abuc) |
| Filing 4 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT PURSUANT TO FRCP 7.1 by Costco Wholesale Corporation.(abuc) |
| Filing 3 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Costco Wholesale Corporation.(abuc) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Greenville County Court of Common Pleas, case number 2019-CP-23-04686. (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0420-8678360), filed by Costco Wholesale Corporation. (Attachments: #1 State Court Documents)(abuc) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Notarmuzi v. Costco Wholesale Corporation | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Margo Notarmuzi | |
| Represented By: | William A Jordan, III |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Costco Wholesale Corporation | |
| Represented By: | Steven J Pugh |
| Represented By: | Robert Wilder Harte |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
