Carlton v. Commissioner Social Security Administration
Melissa Dawn Carlton |
Commissioner Social Security Administration |
Social Security Administrative Record |
6:2019cv03211 |
November 12, 2019 |
US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
Kevin McDonald |
David C Norton |
Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 13, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 TEXT ORDER granting the plaintiff's #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kevin McDonald on 11/13/19.(ctuc, ) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (Restricted Access) by Melissa Dawn Carlton. Response to Motion due by 11/26/2019. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. Proposed order is being emailed to chambers with copy to opposing counsel.Motions referred to Kevin McDonald.(jsmi, ) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Commissioner Social Security Administration ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number IFP.) Clerk's Note: See 28:636(b)(1)(C)(4)(c)(1) and Local Rule 83.VII.02 regarding Consents to Proceed before Magistrate Judge in Social Security cases. Consent to Proceed before Magistrate Judge forms are available on the Court's website., filed by Melissa Dawn Carlton. Service due by 2/10/2020 (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(jsmi, ) (Main Document 1 replaced on 11/13/2019) (jsmi, ). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.