Federal Election Commission et al v. Baker
Plaintiff: Joe Biden, Federal Election Commission and Donald Trump
Defendant: Jacob Baker
Case Number: 6:2020cv03839
Filed: November 3, 2020
Court: US District Court for the District of South Carolina
Presiding Judge: Jacquelyn D Austin
Referring Judge: J Michelle Childs
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 pr
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 2, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 6, 2020 Filing 11 ***DOCUMENT MAILED #8 Order, #10 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION, 9 Text Order on Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis placed in U.S. Mail from Greenville Clerks Office to Jacob Baker 18-7th St Judson Greenville, SC 29611 (rweb, )
November 6, 2020 Filing 10 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION, it is recommended that the District Court dismiss this action without issuance and service of process. Objections to R&R due by 11/20/2020. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jacquelyn D Austin on 11/6/20. (rweb, )
November 6, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 9 TEXT ORDER granting #3 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jacquelyn D Austin on 11/6/20.(rweb, )
November 6, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER directing Clerk not to authorize service. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jacquelyn D Austin on 11/6/20. (rweb, )
November 3, 2020 Filing 5 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Jacob Baker. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(rweb, )
November 3, 2020 Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (Restricted Access) by Jacob Baker. Response to Motion due by 11/17/2020. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)No proposed order.Motions referred to Jacquelyn D Austin.(rweb, )
November 3, 2020 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Joe Biden, Federal Election Commission, Donald Trump, filed by Jacob Baker. Service due by 2/1/2021 (Attachments: #1 Notice's, #2 Supporting Documents, #3 Envelope)(rweb, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Federal Election Commission et al v. Baker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Joe Biden
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Federal Election Commission
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Donald Trump
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jacob Baker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?