Hightower v. G.B. Shoes et al
Mitchell D Hightower |
G.B. Shoes, Ben Justice, Jonathan LNU and Houser Shoes |
6:2020cv03959 |
November 12, 2020 |
US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
Jacquelyn D Austin |
Donald C Coggins |
Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 28, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 21 Summons Issued as to G.B. Shoes, Houser Shoes. Service due by 4/5/2021 (gpre, ) |
Filing 20 ***DOCUMENT MAILED #19 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION, #18 Order 1983, placed in U.S. Mail from Greenville Clerks Office to Mitchell D Hightower 628 Heathwood Drive Taylors, SC 29687 (gpre, ) |
Filing 19 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION it is recommended that the District Court DISMISS Defendants Justice and Jonathan from this action. This action remains pending against the remaining Defendants G.B. Shoes and Houser Shoes. Objections to R&R due by 1/19/2021. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jacquelyn D Austin on 1/5/2021. (gpre, ) |
Filing 18 ORDER (partial) authorizing service of process as to defendants G.B. Shoes, Houser Shoes only. Apprising the defendants of deadline for filing dispositive motions and directing plaintiff to notify the clerk in writing of any change of address. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jacquelyn D Austin on 1/5/2021. (gpre, ) |
Filing 14 ***DOCUMENT MAILED #13 Proper Form Order and USM (4), placed in U.S. Mail from Greenville Clerks Office to Mitchell D Hightower 628 Heathwood Drive Taylors, SC 29687 (rweb, ) |
Filing 13 SECOND PROPER FORM ORDER. Case to be brought into proper form by 12/29/2020. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jacquelyn D Austin on 12/7/20. (rweb, ) |
Filing 11 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Mitchell D Hightower. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(rweb, ) |
Filing 9 ***DOCUMENT MAILED 7 Order on Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, #8 Proper Form Order, summons, USM-285 (2), 26.01, employment discrimination complaint form and original complaint placed in U.S. Mail from Greenville Clerks Office to Mitchell D Hightower 628 Heathwood Drive Taylors, SC 29687 (rweb, ) |
Filing 8 PROPER FORM ORDER. Case to be brought into proper form by 12/7/2020. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jacquelyn D Austin on 11/16/20. (rweb, ) |
Filing 7 TEXT ORDER granting #3 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jacquelyn D Austin on 11/16/20. (rweb, ) |
Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (Restricted Access) by Mitchell D Hightower. Response to Motion due by 11/30/2020. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. No proposed order.Motions referred to Jacquelyn D Austin.(rweb, ) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against G.B. Shoes, Ben Justice, filed by Mitchell D Hightower. Service due by 2/10/2021 #1 EEOC Form(rweb, ) Modified on 11/16/2020 to edit text (rweb, ). (Additional attachment(s) added on 12/1/2020: #4 Employment Complaint, #5 EEOC Charge of Discrimination, #6 Envelope) (rweb, ). Modified on 12/1/2020 to add documents (rweb, ). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.