Massey v. Stumbo et al
| Nicholas A. Massey |
| Joseph T. Morf, David M. Stumbo, The South Carolina Department of Public Safety, Demetrius G. Andrews and The Eighth Circuit Solicitor's Office |
| 6:2021cv00396 |
| February 9, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| Jacquelyn D Austin |
| Donald C Coggins |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. § 1983 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 27, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 20 ANSWER to #14 Amended Complaint, by Joseph T. Morf, The South Carolina Department of Public Safety.(Burton, Stephanie) |
| Filing 19 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by The South Carolina Department of Public Safety. Response to Motion due by 4/14/2021. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. (Attachments: #1 Memo in Support)No proposed order.Motions referred to Jacquelyn D Austin.(Burton, Stephanie) |
| Filing 18 Joint MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM (of Plaintiff's Amended Complaint filed on behalf of David M. Stumbo, Demetrius G. Andrews, and the Eighth Circuit Solicitor's Office) by David M. Stumbo, The Eighth Circuit Solicitor's Office. Response to Motion due by 4/14/2021. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. (Attachments: #1 Memo in Support of Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Amended Complaint filed on behalf of David M. Stumbo, Demetrius G. Andrews and the Eighth Circuit Solicitor's Office)No proposed order.Motions referred to Jacquelyn D Austin.(Darwin, Andrew) |
| Filing 17 NOTICE of Request for Protection from Court Appearance by Stephanie H Burton for April 22-23, 2021; June 14-25, 2021; July 12-16, 2021; August 23-27, 2021 (Burton, Stephanie) |
| Filing 15 RESPONSE in Opposition re #10 Joint MOTION to Dismiss on behalf of David M. Stumbo, Demetrius G. Andrews and the Eighth Circuit Solicitor's Office Response filed by Nicholas A. Massey.Reply to Response to Motion due by 3/24/2021 Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6. (Grose, Ernest) |
| Filing 14 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Demetrius G. Andrews, Joseph T. Morf, David M. Stumbo, The Eighth Circuit Solicitor's Office, The South Carolina Department of Public Safety, filed by Nicholas A. Massey. Service due by 6/15/2021 (Grose, Ernest) |
| Filing 13 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Demetrius G. Andrews.(Harter, Russell) |
| Filing 12 NOTICE of Appearance by Russell W Harter, Jr on behalf of Demetrius G. Andrews (Harter, Russell) |
| Filing 11 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by David M. Stumbo, The Eighth Circuit Solicitor's Office.(Darwin, Andrew) |
| Filing 10 Joint MOTION to Dismiss on behalf of David M. Stumbo, Demetrius G. Andrews and the Eighth Circuit Solicitor's Office by David M. Stumbo, The Eighth Circuit Solicitor's Office. Response to Motion due by 3/17/2021. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. (Attachments: #1 Memo in Support)No proposed order.Motions referred to Jacquelyn D Austin.(Darwin, Andrew) |
Filing 9
SCHEDULING ORDER Rule 26(f) Conference Deadline 3/24/2021, 26(a) Initial Disclosures due by 4/7/2021, Rule 26 Report due by 4/7/2021, Motions to Amend Pleadings due by 4/28/2021, Plaintiffs ID of Expert Witness due by 5/28/2021, Defendants ID of Expert Witnesses Due by 6/28/2021, Records Custodian Affidavit due by 6/28/2021, Discovery due by 8/27/2021, Motions due by 10/26/2021, Mediation Due by 9/27/2021, This case is subject to being called for jury selection and trial thirty (30) days following the issuance of a Report and Recommendation on any motion described in paragraph 9 of this Order, unless otherwise ordered by the Court. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jacquelyn D. Austin on 3/3/2021. (sgri) Modified on 3/5/2021 to edit text (gpre, ).
|
| Filing 8 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Nicholas A. Massey re #1 Complaint, #3 Summons Issued, #4 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories Notice of Filing Certificates of Service (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service David Stumbo, #2 Certificate of Service Demetrius Andrews, #3 Certificate of Service Joseph T. Morf, #4 Certificate of Service Eighth Circuit Solicior's Office, #5 Certificate of Service SC Department of Public Safety)(Grose, Ernest) |
| Filing 7 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Joseph T. Morf, The South Carolina Department of Public Safety.(Burton, Stephanie) |
| Filing 6 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, by Joseph T. Morf, The South Carolina Department of Public Safety.(Burton, Stephanie) |
| Filing 5 ACCEPTANCE OF SERVICE OF COMPLAINT by The South Carolina Department of Public Safety. The South Carolina Department of Public Safety served on 3/2/2021, answer due 3/23/2021. (Burton, Stephanie) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Demetrius G. Andrews, Joseph T. Morf, David M. Stumbo, The Eighth Circuit Solicitor's Office, The South Carolina Department of Public Safety. (sgri) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Demetrius G. Andrews, Joseph T. Morf, David M. Stumbo, The Eighth Circuit Solicitor's Office, The South Carolina Department of Public Safety ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0420-9637397) Filed by Nicholas A. Massey. Service due by 5/11/2021 (sgri) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
