Hogg v. Johnson & Johnson et al
Roberta Hogg |
Ethicon Inc and Johnson & Johnson |
6:2021cv00685 |
March 10, 2021 |
US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
Sherri A Lydon |
Personal Injury: Health Care/Pharmaceutical Personal Injury Product Liability |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 6, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Ethicon Inc, Johnson & Johnson.(Sumner, Robert) |
Filing 6 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by Ethicon Inc, Johnson & Johnson. Response to Motion due by 5/19/2021. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. (Attachments: #1 Memo in Support Memo of Law in Support of Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint)No proposed order.(Sumner, Robert) |
Filing 5 LETTER EXTENDING TIME TO ANSWER Ethicon Inc answer due 5/5/2021; Johnson & Johnson answer due 5/5/2021. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Email re Extension)(Sumner, Robert) |
Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Ethicon Inc, Johnson & Johnson. Service due by 6/9/2021. (lgib, ) |
Filing 3 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Roberta Hogg. (lgib, ) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Ethicon Inc, Johnson & Johnson (filing fee $402 receipt number 0420-9699728), filed by Roberta Hogg. (lgib, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.