Martin v. Trustmark Insurance Company
| Carrie Martin |
| Trustmark Insurance Company |
| 6:2021cv00722 |
| March 12, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| Henry M Herlong |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 19, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 MEDIATION ORDER. Mediation Due by 9/8/2021. Signed by Honorable Henry M Herlong, Jr on 4/19/21. (kmca) |
| Filing 11 Joint Local Rule 26.03 Answers to Interrogatories by Carrie Martin, Trustmark Insurance Company,.(Louzri, Melissa) Modified on 4/19/2021: to add joint filer as listed (kmca). |
| Filing 10 Joint Rule 26 Outline of Discovery Plan by Carrie Martin, Trustmark Insurance Company.(Louzri, Melissa) Modified on 4/19/2021: to add joint filer as listed (kmca). |
| Filing 9 Joint Rule 26(f) Report by Carrie Martin, Trustmark Insurance Company.(Louzri, Melissa) Modified on 4/19/2021: to add joint filer as listed (kmca). |
| Filing 8 ANSWER to Complaint by Trustmark Insurance Company.(Milam, G) |
Filing 7
SCHEDULING ORDER: Rule 26(f) Conference Deadline 4/5/2021, 26(a) Initial Disclosures due by 4/19/2021, Rule 26 Report due by 4/19/2021, Motions to Amend Pleadings due by 6/1/2021, Plaintiffs ID of Expert Witness due by 7/1/2021, Defendants ID of Expert Witnesses Due by 8/2/2021, Records Custodian Affidavit due by 8/2/2021, Discovery due by 9/1/2021, Motions due by 9/15/2021, Rule 26(a)(3) Disclosures due by 10/15/2021, Motion in Limine due by 11/1/2021, Pretrial Briefs due by 11/8/2021, Jury Selection Deadline 11/15/2021. Signed by Honorable Henry M Herlong, Jr on 3/16/21. (kmca)
|
| Filing 6 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Carrie Martin.(Louzri, Melissa) |
| Filing 5 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Trustmark Insurance Company identifying Corporate Parent Trustmark Mutual Holding Company, Corporate Parent Trustmark Insurance Group Inc, Corporate Parent Trustmark Group Inc for Trustmark Insurance Company.. (Milam, G) (Main Document 5 replaced on 3/15/2021: to replace with corrected document (typo) as provided by filing user) (kmca). |
| Filing 3 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Trustmark Insurance Company.(kmca) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Greenville County Court of Common Pleas, case number 2021-CP-23-00422. (Filing fee $402 receipt number 0420-9706016), filed by Trustmark Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 State Court Documents, #2 Exhibit B Declaration of Robert Swan)(kmca) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Martin v. Trustmark Insurance Company | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Carrie Martin | |
| Represented By: | Melissa Leila Louzri |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Trustmark Insurance Company | |
| Represented By: | G Benjamin Milam |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
