Clear Touch Interactive Inc v. Ockers Company, The et al
Clear Touch Interactive Inc |
Ockers Company, The, Touchview Interactive Inc, John J Houser and Jason Houser |
6:2021cv02208 |
July 20, 2021 |
US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
Timothy M Cain |
Trademark |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1114 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 7, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 16 REPLY to Response to Motion re #8 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction Response filed by Jason Houser, John J Houser, Ockers Company, The, Touchview Interactive Inc. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Prior Action Complaint 2021-CP-23-01251)(Lightsey, Wallace) Modified on 9/8/2021: to add text (state court case #) (kmca). |
Filing 15 Plaintiff's Reply and ANSWER to Counterclaim #9 by Clear Touch Interactive Inc.(Perkins, John) |
Filing 13 RESPONSE in Opposition re #8 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction Response filed by Clear Touch Interactive Inc.Reply to Response to Motion due by 9/7/2021 Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Decl of Keone Trask)(Perkins, John) (Main Document 13 replaced on 9/1/2021: to replace with corrected document (LR 1.05) as provided by filing user) (kmca). |
Filing 12 Defendants' Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Jason Houser, John J Houser, Ockers Company, The, Touchview Interactive Inc.(Lightsey, Wallace) |
Filing 9 Defendants' ANSWER to #1 Complaint Affirmative Defenses, COUNTERCLAIM against Clear Touch Interactive Inc by John J Houser, Ockers Company, The, Jason Houser, Touchview Interactive Inc. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1- Initial Reseller Agreement, #2 Exhibit 2- Amendment One, #3 Exhibit 3- Amendment Two, #4 Exhibit 4- Ockers Settlement Agreement, #5 Exhibit 5- Herlong Order, #6 Exhibit 6- Nondisclosure Agreement, #7 Exhibit 7- Termination Letter)(Lightsey, Wallace) |
Filing 8 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction by Jason Houser, John J Houser, Ockers Company, The, Touchview Interactive Inc. Response to Motion due by 8/31/2021. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. (Attachments: #1 Memo in Support, #2 Exhibit A - Declaration of John J. Houser)No proposed order.(Lightsey, Wallace) |
Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Clear Touch Interactive Inc. Jason Houser served on 7/27/2021, answer due 8/17/2021; John J Houser served on 7/27/2021, answer due 8/17/2021; Ockers Company, The served on 7/27/2021, answer due 8/17/2021; Touchview Interactive Inc served on 7/27/2021, answer due 8/17/2021. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit of Service John J Houser, #2 Affidavit of Service Jason Houser, #3 Affidavit of Service The Ockers Company, #4 Affidavit of Service Touchview Interactive Inc)(kmca) Re-filed by clerk to correct event (kmca) |
Filing 6 Report on the Filing of an Action Regarding a Trademark. (kmca) |
Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Jason Houser, John J Houser, Ockers Company, The, Touchview Interactive Inc. (kmca) |
Filing 3 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Clear Touch Interactive Inc.(kmca) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Jason Houser, John J Houser, Ockers Company, The; Touchview Interactive Inc (Filing fee $402 receipt number 0420-9970109), filed by Clear Touch Interactive Inc. Service due by 10/18/2021.(kmca) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.