Rice v. Krispy Krunchy Foods LLC
| William Rice |
| Krispy Krunchy Foods LLC |
| 6:2022cv00909 |
| March 18, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| Timothy M Cain |
| Labor: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal-Breach of Contract |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 13, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 STIPULATION of Dismissal with by William Rice, Krispy Krunchy Foods LLC. (Arnold, W) Modified on 4/13/2022: to add joint filer as listed (kmca). |
Filing 12
ORDER DISMISSING CASE without costs and without prejudice to the right of either party, upon good cause shown within sixty (60) days, to reinstate the action if settlement is not consummated. Signed by Honorable Timothy M Cain on 4/1/22. (kmca)
|
| Filing 11 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by William Rice.(Arnold, W) |
| Filing 10 TEXT ORDER. Jurisdiction in this matter is predicated upon diversity of citizenship pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1332. Within ten (10) days of the date of this order, Defendant Krispy Krunchy Foods LLC is to inform the court of the citizenship of all members for the purpose of determining whether the requirements of federal subject matter jurisdiction are satisfied. See 28 U.S.C. 1332; Gen. Tech. Applications, Inc. v. Exro Ltda, 388 F. 3d 114, 121 (4th Cir. 2004) (holding that "[a limited liability company] is an unincorporated association, akin to a partnership for diversity purposes, whose citizenship is that of its members."). Entered at the direction of the Honorable Timothy M Cain on 3/22/22. (kmca) |
| Filing 9 CLERK'S NOTICE: Plaintiff's Local Rule 26.01 Interrogatories are due fourteen (14) days after removal. (kmca) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE and Acknowledgment of receipt of Notice of Removal by Clerk of Court for Greenville County. (Attachments: #1 State Court Documents Acknowledgment of Removal)(Gantt-Sorenson, Christine) |
| Filing 4 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Krispy Krunchy Foods LLC re #1 Notice of Removal, #3 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories, 2 Civil Cover Sheet. (arut) |
| Filing 3 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Krispy Krunchy Foods LLC.(arut) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Greenville County Court of Common Pleas, case number 2022CP2300855. (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ASCDC-10399466), filed by Krispy Krunchy Foods LLC. (Attachments: #1 State Court Documents)(arut) Modified on 3/21/2022 to correct filing date. (arut). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Rice v. Krispy Krunchy Foods LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: William Rice | |
| Represented By: | W Andrew Arnold |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Krispy Krunchy Foods LLC | |
| Represented By: | Christine Gantt-Sorenson |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
