Craig v. Kendall
| Kenneth J Craig |
| Warden Kendall |
| 6:2022cv01378 |
| April 29, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| Joseph F Anderson |
| Kevin McDonald |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 28, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 ***DOCUMENT MAILED 12 Order on Motion for Extension of Time, placed in U.S. Mail from Greenville Clerks Office to Kenneth J Craig 310521 Lieber Correctional Institution A-B-7 P O Box 205 Ridgeville, SC 29472 (kric, ) |
Filing 12
TEXT ORDER granting #11 motion for extension of time. The petitioner seeks additional time to respond to the Order to Show Cause filed on June 10, 2022 (doc. 11). The petitioner's motion is granted and his response to the Order to Show Cause is due on July 27, 2022. No further extensions will be granted. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kevin McDonald on 6/23/2022.(kric, )
|
| Filing 11 MOTION for Extension of Time by Kenneth J Craig. Response to Motion due by 7/6/2022. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)No proposed order.Motions referred to Kevin McDonald.(kric, ) |
| Filing 10 ***DOCUMENT MAILED #9 Order to Show Cause, placed in U.S. Mail from Greenville Clerks Office to Kenneth J Craig 310521 Lieber Correctional Institution A-B-7 P O Box 205 Ridgeville, SC 29472 (kric, ) |
|
Filing 9
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE The petitioner is granted until June 27, 2022, to respond to this order and provide a factual explanation to show cause why his petition should not be dismissed Signed by Honorable Magistrate Kevin F. McDonald, on 6/10/2022. (kric, ) Modified on 6/10/2022 to edit text (kric, ).
|
| Filing 7 Filing fee: $ 5.00, receipt number SCX600009191 (kric, ) |
| Filing 6 ***DOCUMENT MAILED #5 Proper Form Order, placed in U.S. Mail from Greenville Clerks Office to Kenneth J Craig 310521 Lieber Correctional Institution A-B-7 P O Box 205 Ridgeville, SC 29472 with AO240 Application (kric, ) |
|
Filing 5
PROPER FORM ORDER Case to be brought into proper form by 5/31/2022. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kevin McDonald on 5/9/2022. (kric, )
|
| Filing 2 TRUE DIVISION FOR TRIAL: Spartanburg. (kric, ) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Kenneth J Craig. (Attachments: #1 Supreme Court documents, #2 cover letter, #3 Envelope)(kric, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Craig v. Kendall | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Kenneth J Craig | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Warden Kendall | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
