Cox v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company
| M Stephen Cox and Stephen M Cox |
| Norfolk Southern Railway Company |
| 6:2022cv01919 |
| June 16, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| Henry M Herlong |
| Federal Employer's Liability |
| 45 U.S.C. ยง 151 Railway Labor Act |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 4, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 15 MEDIATION ORDER: Mediation Due prior to 2/21/2023. Signed by Honorable Henry M Herlong, Jr on 8/4/22. (arut) |
| Filing 14 AMENDED CONFERENCE AND SCHEDULING ORDER: Motions to Amend Pleadings due by 11/14/2022, Plaintiff's ID of Expert Witness due by 12/14/2022, Defendant's ID of Expert Witnesses Due by 1/13/2023, Records Custodian Affidavit due by 1/13/2023, Discovery due by 2/13/2023, Motions due by 2/27/2023, Rule 26(a)(3) Disclosures due by 4/14/2023, Motion in Limine due by 5/1/2023, Pretrial Briefs due by 5/8/2023, Jury Selection Deadline 5/15/2023. Signed by Honorable Henry M Herlong, Jr on 8/4/22. (arut) Modified on 8/5/2022 to edit text (Amended) (arut). |
| Filing 13 Joint Local Rule 26.03 Answers to Interrogatories by Stephen M. Cox, Norfolk Southern Railway Company.(Wray, Ronald) Modified on 8/4/2022 to add joint filer as listed. (arut). |
| Filing 12 Joint Rule 26 Outline of Discovery Plan by Stephen M. Cox, Norfolk Southern Railway Company.(Wray, Ronald) Modified on 8/4/2022 to add joint filer as listed. (arut). |
| Filing 11 Joint Rule 26(f) Report by Stephen M. Cox, Norfolk Southern Railway Company. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Amended Conference and Scheduling Order)(Wray, Ronald) Modified on 8/4/2022 to edit docket text (Joint) and add joint filer as listed (arut). |
| Filing 10 TEXT ORDER granting #9 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Signed by Honorable Henry M Herlong, Jr on 7/29/22.(arut) |
| Filing 9 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Howard A. Spier ( Filing fee $ 350 receipt number ASCDC-10608861) by Stephen M Cox. Response to Motion due by 8/8/2022. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Application for Pro Hac Admission)Proposed order is being emailed to chambers with copy to opposing counsel.(Stone, Heather) |
| Filing 8 CONFERENCE AND SCHEDULING ORDER: Rule 26(f) Conference Deadline 8/4/2022, 26(a) Initial Disclosures due by 8/18/2022, Rule 26 Report due by 8/18/2022, Motions to Amend Pleadings due by 9/13/2022, Plaintiffs ID of Expert Witness due by 10/13/2022, Defendants ID of Expert Witnesses Due by 11/14/2022, Records Custodian Affidavit due by 11/14/2022, Discovery due by 12/14/2022, Motions due by 12/28/2022, Rule 26(a)(3) Disclosures due by 2/10/2023, Motions in Limine due by 2/27/2023, Pretrial Briefs due by 3/6/2023, Jury Selection Deadline 3/13/2023. Signed by Honorable Henry M Herlong, Jr on 7/15/22. (arut) |
| Filing 7 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Norfolk Southern Railway Company.(Wray, Ronald) |
| Filing 6 ANSWER to #1 Complaint by Norfolk Southern Railway Company.(Wray, Ronald) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Norfolk Southern Railway Company. (rweb, ) |
| Filing 2 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by M Stephen Cox.(rweb, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Norfolk Southern Railway Company ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ASCDC-10546949.), filed by M Stephen Cox. Service due by 9/14/2022(rweb, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
