Soule v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
| Roy Scott Soule |
| Commissioner of Social Security Administration |
| Social Security Administrative Record and US Attorney - Social Security Noticing |
| 6:2022cv02041 |
| June 28, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| Donald C Coggins |
| Kevin McDonald |
| Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 18, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 STATUS REPORT as to Magistrate jurisdiction by Roy Scott Soule. (Whitten, Beatrice) |
| Filing 9 TEXT ORDER finding as moot #3 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis and granting #8 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Entered at the direction of Magistrate Judge Kevin McDonald on 7/13/22.(arut) |
| Filing 8 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (Restricted Access) by Roy Scott Soule. Response to Motion due by 7/26/2022. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. No proposed order. Motions referred to Kevin McDonald.(arut) Modified on 7/12/2022 refiled by clerk to correct event (arut). |
Filing 7
ORDER: The plaintiff is ordered to submit a fully completed Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs within 14 days of this order. (AO 239 due by 7/12/2022.) Signed by Magistrate Judge Kevin McDonald on 6/28/22. (arut)
|
|
Filing 6
TEXT ORDER: Directing the parties' attention to the Court's Standing Order on All 42 U.S.C. 405(g) Social Security Disability Appeals Assigned to Judge Donald C. Coggins, Jr., located on the District Court's website. Within 30 days of the date of this Text Order, Plaintiff's counsel is directed to file either a (1) signed and completed Notice, Consent, and Reference of Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge form, or (2) status report informing the Court that Plaintiff does not consent to disposition of this action by Magistrate Judge. (Status Report due by 7/28/2022.) Entered at the direction of Honorable Donald C Coggins, Jr on 6/28/22. (arut, )
|
|
Filing 5
Notice: Social Security Case Service. Pursuant to Amended Standing Order 3:21-mc-00212-RBH signed by Chief Judge R. Bryan Harwell, the Clerk has issued a Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) using the Case Management and Electronic Case Filing (CM/ECF) system, notifying the appropriate Regional Social Security Administration Office of the General Counsel and the United States Attorney's Office of the case. No summonses shall issue. Answer due from Commissioner of Social Security Administration on 10/26/2022. (arut, )
|
| Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (Restricted Access) by Roy Scott Soule. Response to Motion due by 7/12/2022. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. No proposed order. Motions referred to Kevin McDonald.(arut) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security Administration Clerk's Note: See 28:636(b)(1)(C)(4)(c)(1) and Local Rule 83.VII.02 regarding Consent to Proceed before Magistrate Judge in Social Security cases. Consent to Proceed before Magistrate Judge forms are available on the Court's website., filed by Roy Scott Soule. (Attachments: #1 Fee Agreement)(arut) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
